>
> "Roger Thorpe" warwick.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:g0f7k0$cd6$1@wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk...

>> Steve Firth wrote:

>>> Roger Thorpe warwick.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>

>>>>Steve Firth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>I look forward to other studies of the use of pavements by cyclsits and
>>>>>motorists because I suspect that they will prove your pronouncements on
>>>>>such use to be also be incorrect.

>>>>
>>>>If he includes pavement parking then I think Doug may be on a winner
>>>>there.

>>>
>>>
>>> Whether parking on or partially on the pavement is legal or otherwise
>>> depends very much on where one is. Even within London where pavement
>>> parking is generally verboten there are areas where parking on the
>>> pavement is required by the local authority.
>>>
>>> Attempting to classify such use as "driving on the pavement" is a
>>> Hansenfallacy (tm).

>>
>> This whole argument has descended as usual into the trading of insults
>> and comparison of apples and oranges. On the parts of this thread that
>> still intrude into uk.rec.cycling you might remember that we're not used
>> to such sophisticated arguments as "I'd say that you're a brainless
>> cunt." we're simple souls who like to feel the breeze in our hair and the
>> sun on our knees.

>
> It's difficult to accept that point of view while you have the likes of
> "Squuzeme" on your NG :o/