>
> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
> within 24 hours..."

> This is how the Heathrow third runway will be forced through.
>
> "Three pensioners were questioned and escorted from Heathrow after
> police decided the Stop Airport Expansion slogan on their T-shirts was
> ‘inflammatory’.
>
> Mike Lacey, John Wilding and his wife Tessa were stopped as they tried
> to join a demonstration against plans for a third runway.
>
> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
> within 24 hours..."
>
> More:
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1026496/Pensioners-held-way-airport-protest...
>
> --
> UK Radical Campaigns ...

> This is how the Heathrow third runway will be forced through.
>
> "Three pensioners were questioned and escorted from Heathrow after
> police decided the Stop Airport Expansion slogan on their T-shirts was
> ‘inflammatory’.
>
> Mike Lacey, John Wilding and his wife Tessa were stopped as they tried
> to join a demonstration against plans for a third runway.
>
> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
> within 24 hours..."
>
> More:
>
> http://www.dailymail

> This is how the Heathrow third runway will be forced through.
>
> "Three pensioners were questioned and escorted from Heathrow after
> police decided the Stop Airport Expansion slogan on their T-shirts was
> ?inflammatory?.
>
> Mike Lacey, John Wilding and his wife Tessa were stopped as they tried
> to join a demonstration against plans for a third runway.
>
> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
> within 24 hours..."

> Doug wrote:

>> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
>> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
>> within 24 hours..."

> Had they been arrested what would have been the charge?

> NM wrote:

>> Doug wrote:

>>> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
>>> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
>>> within 24 hours..."

>> Had they been arrested what would have been the charge?

>
> Aren't terminals actually private premises to which the public are
> invited, but if you have been specificaly told NOT to enter terminal
> grounds can you not be charged with trespass or something.
> IANAL
>
>

> On 15 Jun, 07:21, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>
>
>

>> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
>> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
>> within 24 hours..."

>
> Had they been arrested what would have been the charge?
>

> On 15 Jun, 07:45, NM mac.com> wrote:> On 15 Jun, 07:21, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>

>>> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
>>> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
>>> within 24 hours..."

>

>> Had they been arrested what would have been the charge?

>
> Take your pick. The criminalisation laws are extensive, particularly
> those covering political protest. They could if they wished have used
> the anti-terrorism laws.
>
> Quote:
>
> "Eighty-year-old John Catt served with the RAF in the Second World
> War. Last September, he was stopped by police in Brighton for wearing
> an "offensive" T-shirt which suggested that Bush and Blair be tried
> for war crimes. He was arrested under the Terrorism Act and
> handcuffed, with his arms held behind his back. The official record of ...

> On Jun 16, 7:28 am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>> On 15 Jun, 07:45, NM mac.com> wrote:> On 15 Jun, 07:21, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>>

>>>> Police took their names, addresses and descriptions and followed them
>>>> out of a bus terminal, warning they would be arrested if they returned
>>>> within 24 hours..."

>>> Had they been arrested what would have been the charge?

>> Take your pick. The criminalisation laws are extensive, particularly
>> those covering political protest. They could if they wished have used
>> the anti-terrorism laws.
>>
>> Quote:
>>
>> "Eighty-year-old John Catt served with the RAF in the Second World
>> War. Last September, he was stopped by police in Brighton for wearing
>> an "offensive" T-shirt which suggested that Bush and Blair be tried
>> for war crimes. He was arrested under the Terrorism Act and
>> handcuffed, with his arms held behind his back. The official record of
>> the arrest says the "purpose" of searching him was "terrorism" and the ...