Doug wrote:
> On 2 Feb, 14:00, "Brimstone"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:>> Doug wrote:
>>> On 2 Feb, 11:55, "Brimstone"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:>>>> Doug wrote:
>>>>> On 1 Feb, 09:42, Adrian
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>> You are merely supporting my claim that motorists here introduce
>>>>> criticisms of other groups as a ploy to divert attention away from
>>>>> their own serious misdeeds and that I am not the perpetrator of
>>>>> them, as has been falsely asserted recently.
>>>> Since Christmas you've started well over twenty threads dedicated to
>>>> cars and introduced cars in to other topics. That's more than anyone
>>>> else whilst denying that you're a car enthusiast.
>>> You are missing the point as usual, as are some others here it seems.
>>> Mine are criticisms of car use to counter the relentless pro-car
>>> propaganda on this NG while those of many motorists here are
>>> criticisms of anything except cars.
>> The only cause of "relentless pro-car propaganda on this NG" is as a result
>> of your constat slagging off of cars and the people who use them whilst
>> denying your own responsibility for causing pollution. Why don't you try
>> *not* posting about cars and see whether or not the topics change
>
> You are wrong, as usual. The reason I started criticising the pro-car
> propaganda on this NG in the first place was that there was so much of
> it, as well as motorists' criticism of other forms of transport,
> particularly trains and buses.
What is there good to say about trains and buses except to the
inveterate spotter?
> I may well have succeeded in reducing somewhat the pro-car propaganda
> but have no doubt that if I desisted it would return, due to the
> ongoing domination of this transport NG by motorists.
What a load of rubbish.
--
John Wright
Life is too short to be normal - Heather Kuzmich
