OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport Profile…
 Up
OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Adrian
Date: Feb 1, 2008 01:42

23 Comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Brian Whitehead
Date: Feb 1, 2008 02:39

On 1 Feb, 09:42, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:

I do believe there are photographs of a certain vegan, who is well-
known to us, which disproves this thesis. Anyone care to post them?
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Squashme
Date: Feb 1, 2008 12:45

On 1 Feb, 09:42, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:

You often use Pravda as a source, even the new one?

[In the Soviet period] "As the two newspapers, Pravda and Izvestia,
meant "truth" and "news", a popular saying was "v Pravde net Izvestiy,
v Izvestiyakh net Pravdy" (In Truth there is no News, in News there is
no Truth)." (Wikipedia)

Or do you use Pravda Vodka as a sauce, perhaps?
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Adrian
Date: Feb 1, 2008 13:00

Squashme (Squashme gmail.com>) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying:
> You often use Pravda as a source, even the new one?

Never.
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Doug
Date: Feb 2, 2008 03:48

On 1 Feb, 09:42, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:

You are merely supporting my claim that motorists here introduce
criticisms of other groups as a ploy to divert attention away from
their own serious misdeeds and that I am not the perpetrator of them,
as has been falsely asserted recently.

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
The problem is in not recognising there is a problem.
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Brimstone
Date: Feb 2, 2008 03:55

Doug wrote:
> On 1 Feb, 09:42, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You are merely supporting my claim that motorists here introduce
> criticisms of other groups as a ploy to divert attention away from
> their own serious misdeeds and that I am not the perpetrator of them,
> as has been falsely asserted recently.

Since Christmas you've started well over twenty threads dedicated to cars
and introduced cars in to other topics. That's more than anyone else whilst
denying that you're a car enthusiast.
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Date: Feb 2, 2008 04:10

Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> I am not the perpetrator of them,
> as has been falsely asserted recently.

Those "false" accusations that incuded examples of you starting threads
about cars, you mean? I see you're still on the Humpty-Dumpty
definitions where a word means exactly what you mean it to say, and not
what a dictionary or reasonable person would construe from the word
used.
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Brian Whitehead
Date: Feb 2, 2008 04:36

On 2 Feb, 11:48, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> On 1 Feb, 09:42, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it's off-topic. Sue me.
>
>
> You are merely supporting my claim that motorists here introduce
> criticisms of other groups as a ploy to divert attention away from
> their own serious misdeeds and that I am not the perpetrator of them,
> as has been falsely asserted recently.

It is you who bangs on about cars all the time. More than half of
your posts are car-related, whereas the rest of us only start car-
related threads about a third of the time (I posted the stats a couple
of days ago).
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Adrian
Date: Feb 2, 2008 05:10

Doug (Doug riseup.net>) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:
> You are merely supporting my claim that motorists here introduce
> criticisms of other groups

I'm not criticising anybody. Merely posting a link which some may find of
interest.
no comments
Re: OT: Veggies a "perversion of nature"         


Author: Doug
Date: Feb 2, 2008 05:16

On 2 Feb, 11:55, "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>> On 1 Feb, 09:42, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, it's off-topic. Sue me.
>
>
>> You are merely supporting my claim that motorists here introduce
>> criticisms of other groups as a ploy to divert attention away from
>> their own serious misdeeds and that I am not the perpetrator of them,
>> as has been falsely asserted recently.
>
> Since Christmas you've started well over twenty threads dedicated to cars
> and introduced cars in to other topics. That's more than anyone else whilst
> denying that you're a car enthusiast.
>
You are missing the point as usual, as are some others here it seems.
Mine are criticisms of car use to counter the relentless pro-car
propaganda on this NG while those of many motorists here are
criticisms of anything except cars. ...
Show full article (1.02Kb)
no comments
1 2 3