| Re: OT but fantastic news! |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: Graeme WallGraeme Wall Date: Sep 5, 2008 04:47
In message <7Yh$DvhMZRwIFAd0@ perry.co.uk>
Roland Perry perry.co.uk> wrote:
> In message bt.com>, at 11:58:19 on Fri, 5 Sep
> 2008, Brimstone yahoo.co.uk> remarked:
>
>>> Why would the public fund a hugely expensive canal just to ship sugar
>>> once a week to a brewery?
>>
>>If a company wants a new road into its site then there's nothing to stop the
>>company building it subject to planning permission etc. Is there any reason
>>that a company couldn't build a new canal arm?
>
> Where would the "other end" of this arm be? I expect they could build it
> if they wanted to, but the expense would be prohibitive. The proposition
> to ship sugar to the brewery was only ever viable when the brewery was
> in the town centre and the boatman was under-quoting (he apparently
> needed ad-hoc return loads to make it economic).
>
I didn't say that either.
>>(IIRC Worton Grange is on a trading estate.)
>
> It is now, although when it was built it was pretty much on its own.
>
>>If the new arm went into a trading estate then the arm could carry traffic
>>for the other companys using the site.
>
> The big building next door used to be DEC (the minicomputer people) head
> office. I think it may now be a telecoms company. They probably don't
> need much delivered.
Paperclips by the ton!
|