Re: OT but fantastic news!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: OT but fantastic news!         

Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: Graeme Wall
Date: Sep 5, 2008 04:47

In message <7Yh$DvhMZRwIFAd0@perry.co.uk>
Roland Perry perry.co.uk> wrote:
> In message bt.com>, at 11:58:19 on Fri, 5 Sep
> 2008, Brimstone yahoo.co.uk> remarked:
>
>>> Why would the public fund a hugely expensive canal just to ship sugar
>>> once a week to a brewery?
>>
>>If a company wants a new road into its site then there's nothing to stop the
>>company building it subject to planning permission etc. Is there any reason
>>that a company couldn't build a new canal arm?
>
> Where would the "other end" of this arm be? I expect they could build it
> if they wanted to, but the expense would be prohibitive. The proposition
> to ship sugar to the brewery was only ever viable when the brewery was
> in the town centre and the boatman was under-quoting (he apparently
> needed ad-hoc return loads to make it economic).
>

I didn't say that either.
>>(IIRC Worton Grange is on a trading estate.)
>
> It is now, although when it was built it was pretty much on its own.
>
>>If the new arm went into a trading estate then the arm could carry traffic
>>for the other companys using the site.
>
> The big building next door used to be DEC (the minicomputer people) head
> office. I think it may now be a telecoms company. They probably don't
> need much delivered.

Paperclips by the ton!

--
Graeme Wall
This address is not read, substitute trains for rail.
Transport Miscellany at <http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html>
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!