>andrew privacy.net> wrote:
>

>>>>>Nonsense.
>>>>>What evidence is there for this?

>>>>
>>>> About as much as there is for second hand smoke causing cancer. i.e.
>>>> hardly any.

>>>
>>>Oh, dear, oh, dear, oh, dear. Another junky swimming in Egypt.

>>
>> So just a smart-arse with no cite or link to back up this claim?

>
>The cancer-stick suckers refuse to accept the evidence that the cancer
>stick causes cancer or indeed that it causes circulatory diseases,
>including heart attack, stroke and gangrene. As I posted before they
>even deny such a link at the time that a surgeon is sawing off their
>suppurating gangrenous limbs, and can be found in the grounds of
>hospitals sucking on a cigarette within days of having a limb hacked
>off. If they can't get a hint after such an experience, what makes you
>think the drug-addled twits will believe an epidemiological study?
>
>Anyway there's plenty of evidence that smoking both direct and passive
>cases cancers and ot just lung cancer.
>
><http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/172_11_050600/burton/burton.html#bo
>x1>