On 8 Aug, 12:23, Huge wrote:
> On 2008-08-08, Steve Firth <%%ste...@
malloc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> andrew
privacy.net> wrote:>
>>>>>>Nonsense.
>>>>>>What evidence is there for this?
>
>>>>> About as much as there is for second hand smoke causing cancer. Â i.e.
>>>>> hardly any.
>
>>>>Oh, dear, oh, dear, oh, dear. Another junky swimming in Egypt.
>
>>> So just a smart-arse with no cite or link  to back up this claim?
>
> No, I just don't GAS about moron junkies who are determined to ignore the
> evidence. Just hurry up and die, will you?
>
>> The cancer-stick suckers refuse to accept the evidence that the cancer
>> stick causes cancer or indeed that it causes circulatory diseases,
>> including heart attack, stroke and gangrene. As I posted before they
>> even deny such a link at the time that a surgeon is sawing off their
>> suppurating gangrenous limbs, and can be found in the grounds of
>> hospitals sucking on a cigarette within days of having a limb hacked
>> off. If they can't get a hint after such an experience, what makes you
>> think the drug-addled twits will believe an epidemiological study?
>
>> Anyway there's plenty of evidence that smoking both direct and passive
>> cases cancers and ot just lung cancer.
>
>
> Of course there is. I simply cannot any longer be arsed to trot out the evidence
> over and over and over again to junkies who are determined not to believe it.
The wonderful thing is that it is their own funeral, not mine, now I
am no longer forced to breath their secondhand smoke. Don't want to
believe the evidence - be my guest, that is after all how Darwinism
works.
