> Well as you might be qute happy to rely on foods grown without
> petrolchemical fertilizers, sunshine, the reality is that that we cannot
> grow
> enough food to feed the worlds popuulation without them, thus I can deduce
> that you are quite happy to starve to death.
>

> As long as there's a lump of protein that can't explain Pythagoras's
> Theorem, I won't starve
>

> In article news.demon.co.uk>,
> johnr@journeyflow.spamspam.demon.co.uk says...

>> Bazzer Smith wrote:

>>> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>> news:iemdnZ0rJ4G55RXVnZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@posted.plusnet...

>>>>
>>>> "Bazzer Smith" invalid.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:5D_hk.4316$PL3.3912@newsfe12.ams2...

>>>>> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top
>>>>> scientist has stated
>>>>> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
>>>>> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face
>>>>> starvation
>>>>> within our own lifestyle.

>>>>
>>>> That is on the level of Doug stupidity. ...

>> I'm quite happy to keep living on food grown entirely without petrochemical
>> *fertilisers* (there is no Z in it apart from the sceptics).

>
> How about any pharmaceuticals/medicines?
>

> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
> stated
> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.

> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face
> starvation
> within our own lifestyle.
>
> It is imperative we stop wasting it now we only have few years food
> supply at the current rate of consumption. If we stopped wasting it on
> transport and heating the oil we have could guarantee our
> food ssupply for 40-50 years (assuming the population remains stable).

> "Bazzer Smith" invalid.net> wrote in message
>
> news:5D_hk.4316$PL3.3912@newsfe12.ams2...
>

>> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
>> stated
>> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.

>
> Cite? Or even the name of this 'top scientist'
>

>> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
>> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face
>> starvation
>> within our own lifestyle.

>

>> It is imperative we stop wasting it now we only have few years food
>> supply at the current rate of consumption. If we stopped wasting it on
>> transport and heating the oil we have could guarantee our ...

>> It's the traditional solution to the developed world being short of
>> anything. Go somewhere with fewer arms and more of what you want, kill
>> lots of them and take all their stuff.

> I think you'll find Third World countries have MORE arms that Western
> ones.

> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
> stated
> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.
>
> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face starvation
> within our own lifestyle.

> Food grows without fertilizer or by using slurry which is animal shit.
> So we can manage perfectly OK without oil based fertilizers.

>
> "John Rowland" journeyflow.spamspam.demon.co.uk> wrote
>

>>>> Why would we starve? Wouldn't we just kill all the people in the
>>>> third world and steal their food?

>>>
>>> <'Kin Roared!>

>

>> It was a realistic prediction: when a people have a choice between
>> starving and killing, there isn't much deciding to do, and I don't
>> suspect the future will be any different.

>
> Dude, I could not agree more.

>
>