> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
> stated
> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.
>
> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face
> starvation
> within our own lifestyle.
>
> It is imperative we stop wasting it now we only have few years food
> supply at the current rate of consumption. If we stopped wasting it on
> transport and heating the oil we have could guarantee our
> food ssupply for 40-50 years (assuming the population remains stable).

> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
> stated
> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.
>
> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face starvation
> within our own lifestyle.

> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
> stated
> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.
>
> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face starvation
> within our own lifestyle.
>
> It is imperative we stop wasting it now we only have few years food
> supply at the current rate of consumption. If we stopped wasting it on
> transport and heating the oil we have could guarantee our
> food ssupply for 40-50 years (assuming the population remains stable).

> I'm quite happy to keep living on food grown entirely without
> petrochemical *fertilisers* (there is no Z in it apart from the
> sceptics).

>
> "Bazzer Smith" invalid.net> wrote in message
> news:5D_hk.4316$PL3.3912@newsfe12.ams2...

>> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
>> stated
>> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.
>>
>> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
>> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face
>> starvation
>> within our own lifestyle.

>
> That is on the level of Doug stupidity.
>
> I'm quite happy to keep living on food grown entirely without
> petrochemical *fertilisers* (there is no Z in it apart from the sceptics).

> On 24 Jul, 13:32, "Bazzer Smith" invalid.net> wrote:

>> After studying the world food supply and oil reserves a top scientist has
>> stated
>> that we can no longer afford to use oil for transportor heating.
>>
>> We don't need cars and we can wrap up to keep warm however we
>> do need food. Without the oil to produce the fertilizers we face
>> starvation
>> within our own lifestyle.
>>
>> It is imperative we stop wasting it now we only have few years food
>> supply at the current rate of consumption. If we stopped wasting it on
>> transport and heating the oil we have could guarantee our
>> food ssupply for 40-50 years (assuming the population remains stable).

>
> How about we just stop having kids for a while.
>
> It's amazing how many eco-warriors there are that can real out four ...

> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>

>> I'm quite happy to keep living on food grown entirely without
>> petrochemical *fertilisers* (there is no Z in it apart from the
>> sceptics).

>
> Umm, I think you mean "septics", as in tank, rather than "sceptics", as
> in "don't believe that bollocks".

> Well as you might be qute happy to rely on foods grown without
> petrolchemical fertilizers,

> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>

>> I'm quite happy to keep living on food grown entirely without
>> petrochemical *fertilisers* (there is no Z in it apart from the
>> sceptics).

>
> Umm, I think you mean "septics", as in tank, rather than "sceptics", as
> in "don't believe that bollocks".