More problems with biofuels
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport Profile…
 Up
More problems with biofuels         


Author: Fod
Date: Aug 18, 2007 01:04

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6949861.stm

While I may have poked holes in Dougs black and white absolute
rantings there could be a nugget of truth in his general arguement.

Biofuels have good and bad points; given they've turned into a green
government fashion accessory thats likely to cause them to be rushed.
Which makes them more likely to be done badly.

Fod
50 Comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Date: Aug 18, 2007 03:41

"Fod" googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1187424248.198475.142550@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6949861.stm
>
> While I may have poked holes in Dougs black and white absolute
> rantings there could be a nugget of truth in his general arguement.
>
> Biofuels have good and bad points; given they've turned into a green
> government fashion accessory thats likely to cause them to be rushed.
> Which makes them more likely to be done badly.

Reforestation releases methane a greenhouse gas approximately 20x more
effective than CO2, but you will get some of that from bio fuel production
plus the fact that since the 1970s most industrialised counties have been
burning more calories in farming than has been produced (now it's true you
use more of some of the plants when you make bio-ethanol and bio-derv). Still
even driving a petrol car produces less CO2 than walking. (The average car
produces 0.3kg per mile, the average walk 1.2kg and cycling is back at 0.3kg
the same as the car) " How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, Chris Goodall"
Show full article (1.47Kb)
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Author: Nick Finnigan
Date: Aug 18, 2007 05:25

Depresion wrote:
> even driving a petrol car produces less CO2 than walking. (The average car
> produces 0.3kg per mile, the average walk 1.2kg and cycling is back at 0.3kg
> the same as the car) " How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, Chris Goodall"

'the equivalent of 3.6 kg of global warming gases', assuming you only
eat beef. Also assuming you need 180 kcal to walk a mile, which is
rather high.

http://www.lowcarbonlife.net/downloads/beef.pdf
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Author: DavidR
Date: Aug 18, 2007 06:43

"Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote
> Still even driving a petrol car produces less CO2 than walking. (The
> average car produces 0.3kg per mile, the average walk 1.2kg and cycling
> is back at 0.3kg the same as the car) " How to Live a Low-Carbon Life,
> Chris Goodall"

So how much CO2 does driving to an airconditioned leisure centre to use a
bicycle that's bolted to the floor produce?

Looks like some rather silly assumptions being used here.
> It also looks like the rest of the web of green lies are crumbling with
> the Rail Safety and Standards Board admitting that catching a train is
> twice as bad for the environment as going by car for the average family.

That's not what was said. A car doing 60mpg betters the per-seat
consumption of a High Speed train. The typical single occupant car has
quite some way to go before matching a crowded commuter train.
> Oddly echoing calculations I showed on here a good few years back. The
> government are now telling people paper is worse than plastic for your
> shopping bags.

One department worries about landfill... another dreams up ways to tax CO2.
Don't you love joined up government?
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Date: Aug 18, 2007 06:47

"DavidR" 4bidden.org.uk> wrote in message
news:5iob56F3pt8tkU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> That's not what was said. A car doing 60mpg betters the per-seat
> consumption of a High Speed train.

Actually that's not what was said at all. If you are going to try to correct
someone then you may try to get your facts right rather then sticking your
head in a bucket of ignorance then drawing attention to it.
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Author: Doug
Date: Aug 19, 2007 00:00

On 18 Aug, 09:04, Fod googlemail.com> wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6949861.stm
>
> While I may have poked holes in Dougs black and white absolute
> rantings there could be a nugget of truth in his general arguement.
>
> Biofuels have good and bad points; given they've turned into a green
> government fashion accessory thats likely to cause them to be rushed.
> Which makes them more likely to be done badly.
>
> Fod

Admit it, despite your feeble excuses, you are now bound to agree with
me.

Aggrofuels are just another example of greenwash, with very few if any
good points. This has less to do with government and everything to do
with a bunch of bandwagon profiteers who are out to exploit the
unwary.
Show full article (1.48Kb)
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Author: Brimstone
Date: Aug 19, 2007 00:05

"Doug" riseup.net> wrote in message
news:1187506849.600527.123830@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On 18 Aug, 09:04, Fod googlemail.com> wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6949861.stm
>>
>> While I may have poked holes in Dougs black and white absolute
>> rantings there could be a nugget of truth in his general arguement.
>>
>> Biofuels have good and bad points; given they've turned into a green
>> government fashion accessory thats likely to cause them to be rushed.
>> Which makes them more likely to be done badly.
>>
>> Fod
>
> Admit it, despite your feeble excuses, you are now bound to agree with
> me.
>
> Aggrofuels are just another example of greenwash, with very few if any
> good points. This has less to do with government and everything to do
> with a bunch of bandwagon profiteers who are out to exploit the ...
Show full article (1.63Kb)
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Author: cupra
Date: Aug 19, 2007 00:46

Doug wrote:
> On 18 Aug, 09:04, Fod googlemail.com> wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6949861.stm
>>
>> While I may have poked holes in Dougs black and white absolute
>> rantings there could be a nugget of truth in his general arguement.
>>
>> Biofuels have good and bad points; given they've turned into a green
>> government fashion accessory thats likely to cause them to be rushed.
>> Which makes them more likely to be done badly.
>>
>> Fod
>
> Admit it, despite your feeble excuses, you are now bound to agree with
> me.
>
> Aggrofuels are just another example of greenwash, with very few if any
> good points. This has less to do with government and everything to do
> with a bunch of bandwagon profiteers who are out to exploit the
> unwary. ...
Show full article (1.66Kb)
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Author: cupra
Date: Aug 19, 2007 01:00

Doug wrote:
> On 18 Aug, 09:04, Fod googlemail.com> wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6949861.stm
>>
>> While I may have poked holes in Dougs black and white absolute
>> rantings there could be a nugget of truth in his general arguement.
>>
>> Biofuels have good and bad points; given they've turned into a green
>> government fashion accessory thats likely to cause them to be rushed.
>> Which makes them more likely to be done badly.
>>
>> Fod
>
> Admit it, despite your feeble excuses, you are now bound to agree with
> me.
>
> Aggrofuels are just another example of greenwash, with very few if any
> good points. This has less to do with government and everything to do
> with a bunch of bandwagon profiteers who are out to exploit the
> unwary. ...
Show full article (1.52Kb)
no comments
Re: More problems with biofuels         


Date: Aug 19, 2007 01:56

Doug wrote:
> Just ask yourself, how are you supposed to avoid scurvy and what are you
> supposed to eat in the winter if heated greenhouses are to be avoided?

In no particular order: rose hip, blackcurrant, parsley, broccoli,
loganberry, Brussels sprouts, strawberries, cauliflower, raspberries,
redcurrant, spinach, green cabbage, potatoes, tomatoes, carrots, apples,
gooseberries...

Preserves thereof for when not in season.
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6