|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Sep 2, 2008 11:10
> On 1 Sep, 20:42, "nightjar" .me.uk>
> wrote:
>>> Hmm, yes, quote Hadley Centre: "...A brief look at the graph depicting
>>> January global average temperatures reveals large variability in our
>>> climate year-on-year, but with an underlying rise over the longer term
>>> almost certainly caused by man-made emissions of greenhouse gases..."
>>
>>> "...In future, while the trend in global temperatures is predicted to
>>> remain upwards, we will continue to see inherent variability of this
>>> kind."
>> ...
|
| Show full article (7.16Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 2, 2008 11:54
"Tommy" what.acon> wrote in message
news:3g9vk.143744$oT7.35094@newsfe10.ams2...>>
>> Says the Daily Mail. Care to post a link to a peer reviewed paper instead?
>>
>> --
> Why?
In other words you can't because no such paper exists.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ®i©ardo®i©ardo Date: Sep 2, 2008 12:52
Derek wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:01:11 -0700 (PDT), Doug riseup.net>
> wrote:
>
> Confused infantile"proof by selected instances"
> >> And I don't believe in the infallibility of individual motorist
>> polluters like you who have a vested interest in denying GW.
>
> What about your pollution?
>
> You won't need firelighters where you're going.
>
> Derek
>
LOL!
--
Moving things in still pictures!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: CliveClive Date: Sep 2, 2008 13:58
>Now the link between temperature and
>CO2 is working in the opposite direction. Human-induced increases in
>CO2 are driving the greenhouse effect and amplifying the recent
>warming."
How do you arrive by this idea when it's been know for years that a rise
in global temperatures lead to a rise in C02 from the seas, much greater
than any that can be made by man.
--
Clive
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: CliveClive Date: Sep 2, 2008 16:17
>Yes mate , its called physics. CO2 absorbs certain infra red
>frequencies, converts the EM energy into kinetic and vibrational
>energy and shares it out with the rest of the atmosphere via
>mollecular collisions - ie it heats the other gases up. More CO2 =
>more absorbtion of infra red = more heating of the atmosphere. Argue
>away all you want , but you might as well argue that 2+2 doesn't equal
>4. The effect this heating will have is the unknown, not the heating
>itself.
What's interesting is your total lack of mentioning the oceans as a
giant carbon sink, then you expect us to believe you're not
scaremongering.
--
Clive
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DougDoug Date: Sep 2, 2008 23:31
On 2 Sep, 18:34, "nightjar" .me.uk>
wrote:
>> On 2 Sep, 08:46, "nightjar" .me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> "Doug" riseup.net> wrote in message>
>
>>>> On 1 Sep, 18:17, "nightjar" .me.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> "Boltar" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message>
> ...
|
| Show full article (5.49Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DougDoug Date: Sep 3, 2008 00:08
On 2 Sep, 19:10, "nightjar" .me.uk>
wrote:
>> On 1 Sep, 20:42, "nightjar" .me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> "Doug" riseup.net> wrote in message>
>
>>>> Hmm, yes, quote Hadley Centre: "...A brief look at the graph depicting
>>>> January global average temperatures reveals large variability in our
>>>> climate year-on-year, but with an underlying rise over the longer term
>>>> almost certainly caused by man-made emissions of greenhouse gases..."
> ...
|
| Show full article (9.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FodFod Date: Sep 3, 2008 01:53
On Sep 3, 8:08 am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> I agree that we should prepare for climate change, which will
> mean moving many millions of people away from low lying areas, such as
> Central London for example,
The best thing to do about Global warming would be as little as
possible. Whenever the human race tries to change something it
generally makes things far worse in other unintended ways.
The planet is always changing. We don't understand the change and at
best we've got some educated guess as to what might happen.
We'd be far better off trying to fix the more serious threats to life
on this planet.
Fod
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: Sep 3, 2008 02:52
Fod wrote:
> On Sep 3, 8:08 am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>
>>> I agree that we should prepare for climate change, which will
>> mean moving many millions of people away from low lying areas, such
>> as Central London for example,
>
> The best thing to do about Global warming would be as little as
> possible. Whenever the human race tries to change something it
> generally makes things far worse in other unintended ways.
>
> The planet is always changing. We don't understand the change and at
> best we've got some educated guess as to what might happen.
>
> We'd be far better off trying to fix the more serious threats to life
> on this planet.
>
Starting in Catford?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: CliveClive Date: Sep 3, 2008 03:22
>Well we shall see. Whether this alleged cooling will compensate for
>anthropogenic warming is a moot point but rather than wait and see and
>risk millions of lives just so that motorists, for example, can carry
>on exercising their polluting right to drive regardless maybe the
>precautionary principle should be applied instead.
If we continue to use our cars, we just might stop the next cooling
period or ice age, but of course that won't sit well with your biases.
Don't reply, it'll just be a load of daily wail garbage. (Yes their
name was in lower case as befits their position.)
--
Clive
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
