|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DougDoug Date: Jun 24, 2008 10:38
Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other
way around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for
getting in the way of the car, obviously. Seems blaming the vulnerable
victim is not confined just to this NG.
"LEWISHAM: Toddler dies after road accident
A toddler who was struck by a car last night (June 23) has died in
hospital.
The accident happened at around 10pm when the two-year-old boy was in
collision with the vehicle in Woolstone Road, Forest Hill.
He was taken to King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, where he died
at 7.44am this morning (June 24).
His mother Patricia Brito was too distraught to talk about what
happened to her son Kevin.
But nearby residents say he had got out of his home somehow and was in
the road when the incident happened.
They say the two-year-old became trapped under the vehicle and was
dragged underneath as it skidded to a stop..."
More:
http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news/topstories/display.var.2359754.0.lewisha...
|
| Show full article (1.13Kb) |
|
| | 65 Comments |
|
|
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: Jun 24, 2008 10:48
Doug wrote:
> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other
> way around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for
> getting in the way of the car, obviously. Seems blaming the vulnerable
> victim is not confined just to this NG.
>
And it seems that you're still quite happy to gloat of the tragic death of a
child and the obvious distress of his family.
You really should see a doctor.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: GraculusGraculus Date: Jun 24, 2008 10:49
> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other
> way around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for
> getting in the way of the car, obviously. Seems blaming the vulnerable
> victim is not confined just to this NG.
Trying to make something out of someone's misfortune again, are you? Nowhere
in what you copy'n'pasted does it attempt to apportion any blame to the boy,
so I am not sure what you are trying to say (actually, I do know what you
are trying to say, it's just that you have absolutely no basis for saying
it).
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Jun 24, 2008 11:04
On 24 Jun, 18:38, Doug riseup.net> wrote:> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other
> way around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for
> getting in the way of the car, obviously. Seems blaming the vulnerable
> victim is not confined just to this NG.
Good wank, was it Gollum?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AdrianAdrian Date: Jun 24, 2008 13:15
Doug riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:
> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other way
> around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for getting in
> the way of the car, obviously.
Must have brought back memories, eh, Duhg?
> A toddler who was struck by a car last night (June 23) has died in
> hospital.
Seems to put the onus on the car there.
> when the two-year-old boy was in collision with the vehicle
Which he was. There's no "blame" in that wording. The boy was in
collision with the vehicle which was in collision with the boy.
> But nearby residents say he had got out of his home somehow and was in
> the road when the incident happened.
>
> They say the two-year-old became trapped under the vehicle and was
> dragged underneath as it skidded to a stop..."
|
| Show full article (1.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AdrianAdrian Date: Jun 24, 2008 13:16
"Graculus" hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying:
> Nowhere in what you copy'n'pasted does it attempt to apportion any blame
> to the boy
Apart from being fairly explicit that he'd escaped from the house and was
in the road - and that the car driver stopped as quickly as s/he possibly
could after hitting the poor little sod.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Jun 24, 2008 12:34
> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other
> way around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for
> getting in the way of the car, obviously. Seems blaming the vulnerable
> victim is not confined just to this NG.
>
> "LEWISHAM: Toddler dies after road accident
>
> A toddler who was struck by a car last night (June 23) has died in
> hospital.
>
> The accident happened at around 10pm when the two-year-old boy was in
> collision with the vehicle in Woolstone Road, Forest Hill.
>
> He was taken to King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, where he died
> at 7.44am this morning (June 24).
>
> His mother Patricia Brito was too distraught to talk about what
> happened to her son Kevin. ...
|
| Show full article (1.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Jun 24, 2008 15:47
Doug wrote:
> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other
> way around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for
> getting in the way of the car, obviously. Seems blaming the vulnerable
> victim is not confined just to this NG.
>
> "LEWISHAM: Toddler dies after road accident
>
> A toddler who was struck by a car last night (June 23) has died in
> hospital.
>
> The accident happened at around 10pm when the two-year-old boy was in
> collision with the vehicle in Woolstone Road, Forest Hill.
>
> He was taken to King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, where he died
> at 7.44am this morning (June 24).
>
> His mother Patricia Brito was too distraught to talk about what
> happened to her son Kevin.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DougDoug Date: Jun 24, 2008 22:45
On 24 Jun, 21:15, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:> Doug riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>>> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other way
>> around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for getting in
>> the way of the car, obviously.
>
> Must have brought back memories, eh, Duhg?
>
>> A toddler who was struck by a car last night (June 23) has died in
>> hospital.
>
> Seems to put the onus on the car there.
>
>> when the two-year-old boy was in collision with the vehicle
>
> Which he was. There's no "blame" in that wording. The boy was in
> collision with the vehicle which was in collision with the boy.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DougDoug Date: Jun 24, 2008 22:46
On 24 Jun, 20:34, "Dr Zoidberg" drzoidberg.co.uk>
wrote:>> Interesting. 'boy was in collision with the vehicle', not the other
>> way around? Of course, the dead toddler had to be for blame for
>> getting in the way of the car, obviously. Seems blaming the vulnerable
>> victim is not confined just to this NG.
>
>> "LEWISHAM: Toddler dies after road accident
>
>> A toddler who was struck by a car last night (June 23) has died in
>> hospital.
>
>> The accident happened at around 10pm when the two-year-old boy was in
>> collision with the vehicle in Woolstone Road, Forest Hill. ...
|
| Show full article (1.42Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
