On 18 Sep, 15:12, Fod googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2:46Â pm, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> On 18 Sep, 10:02, %%ste...@
malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
>
>>> Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>>>> Cutting greenwash is empty posturing
>
>>> Why are you objecting to the government proposing a scheme whioch would
>>> ensure a steady supply of money from rich countries to poor countries?
>
>> People and corporations should not be allowed to pay their way out of
>> causing harm to people and the planet. Most of these measures in
>> developing countries would happen anyway.
>
> Why? Â It would be cheaper to not implement these measures. Â The
> countries in question are not exactly rolling in cash.
>
Hasn't it begun to occur to you yet that saving energy also saves
money?
>
> I know you want to keep them under the cosh so that they are doomed to
> a life of being exploited to grow you cheap food and make you cheap
> clothing.
>
You couldn't be more wrong.
>
>> What is stopping government giving aid to poor countries with no
>> strings attached?
>
> If they use the money to pollute why would you be supporting such a
> move?
>
So you think the money should be withheld in case it is used to
pollute?