> On 14 Sep, 23:27, Philly wrote:

>> BrianW wrote:

>>> On 14 Sep, 10:41, %%ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:

>>

>>>> Once more, you're wrong and lazy because you failed to read the Act in
>>>> question. But is this a surprise to anyone?

>>

>>> Gollum + law = fuckup appears to be just as reliable a guide as Gollum
>>> + maths = fuckup and Gollum + science = fuckup.

>>
>> Applying Occams Razor to your hypothesis, we see that the second
>> qualifier appears to be superfluous. The refined version of the formula
>> simply reads Gollum=fuckup.