> On 11 Sep, 07:30, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>
>
>

>> On 11 Sep, 07:18, Paul Weaver isorox.co.uk> wrote:

>

>>> On 11 Sep, 07:10, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>

>>>> If so millions of motorists must be breaking this law too. And they
>>>> have the barefaced cheek to criticise cyclists for lawbreaking!

>

>>> Of course the non-motorists that criticise cyclists for law breaking?

>

>>>> "But the council was defiant, saying it was illegal to drive over a
>>>> kerbed footway or verge and action was necessary."

>

>>> The council installed the driveway without getting the correct
>>> planning permission, or the planning office didn't do their job
>>> properly -- it's not illegal to drive over a dropped kerb.

>

>> You are missing the point. This is about non-dropped kerbs, over which
>> many motorists drive on a daily basis and seem to be allowed to get
>> away with it.

>
> But it was the incompetent council who put the driveway there in the
> first place, they're the villains of the story, one might argue it's
> entrapment.