> BrianW wrote:

>> On 11 Sep, 15:01, francis yahoo.com> wrote:

>>> On 11 Sep, 11:06, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>>> On 11 Sep, 07:37, "Graculus" hotmail.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:> "Doug" riseup.net> wrote in message

>>>>> news:cb3e32a7-7f77-4b62-a46a-6fe36836cd0c@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

>>>>>> If so millions of motorists must be breaking this law too. And
>>>>>> they have the barefaced cheek to criticise cyclists for
>>>>>> lawbreaking!

>>>>> So, you are obviously endorsing the alternative. which is to park
>>>>> on the street:
>>>>> "Fearful of being hit with fines, homeowners in Pinfold Street,
>>>>> Eastrington, East Yorkshire, are being forced to park on the
>>>>> street, causing traffic congestion as a result."

>>>> Nope. I am endorsing the removal of preferential treatment from car
>>>> owners. If they do not have suitable storage space on their own
>>>> property and are not prepared to pay for garaging elsewhere they
>>>> should not have cars.

>>>>> Nice to see yet another bureacratic public sector body
>>>>> approaching a problem with a win-win approach (NOT). Why don't
>>>>> these people realise that it could be solved without antagonising
>>>>> everyone with immediate threats, but to work with them to come up
>>>>> with a sensible solution?

>>>> Such as?
>>>> --
>>>> World Carfree Networkhttp://www.worldcarfree.net/
>>>> Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.

>>> Have you got a dropped kerb outside your house Doug?

>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/gollumofcatford/2620828418/>
>>
>> Yes, he has.

>
> There must be a fair weight in that trailer to crack the paving slab.