> On 11 Sep, 15:01, francis yahoo.com> wrote:

>> On 11 Sep, 11:06, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>> On 11 Sep, 07:37, "Graculus" hotmail.co.uk>
>>> wrote:> "Doug" riseup.net> wrote in message

>>>> news:cb3e32a7-7f77-4b62-a46a-6fe36836cd0c@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

>>>>> If so millions of motorists must be breaking this law too. And they
>>>>> have the barefaced cheek to criticise cyclists for lawbreaking!

>>>> So, you are obviously endorsing the alternative. which is to park on the
>>>> street:
>>>> "Fearful of being hit with fines, homeowners in Pinfold Street, Eastrington,
>>>> East Yorkshire, are being forced to park on the street, causing traffic
>>>> congestion as a result."

>>> Nope. I am endorsing the removal of preferential treatment from car
>>> owners. If they do not have suitable storage space on their own
>>> property and are not prepared to pay for garaging elsewhere they
>>> should not have cars.

>>>> Nice to see yet another bureacratic public sector body approaching a problem
>>>> with a win-win approach (NOT). Why don't these people realise that it could
>>>> be solved without antagonising everyone with immediate threats, but to work
>>>> with them to come up with a sensible solution?

>>> Such as?
>>> --
>>> World Carfree Networkhttp://www.worldcarfree.net/
>>> Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.

>> Have you got a dropped kerb outside your house Doug?

>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/gollumofcatford/2620828418/>
>
> Yes, he has.