On 11 Sep, 15:01, francis yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 11 Sep, 11:06, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 11 Sep, 07:37, "Graculus" hotmail.co.uk>
>> wrote:> "Doug" riseup.net> wrote in message
>
>
>>>> If so millions of motorists must be breaking this law too. And they
>>>> have the barefaced cheek to criticise cyclists for lawbreaking!
>
>>> So, you are obviously endorsing the alternative. which is to park on the
>>> street:
>>> "Fearful of being hit with fines, homeowners in Pinfold Street, Eastrington,
>>> East Yorkshire, are being forced to park on the street, causing traffic
>>> congestion as a result."
>
>> Nope. I am endorsing the removal of preferential treatment from car
>> owners. If they do not have suitable storage space on their own
>> property and are not prepared to pay for garaging elsewhere they
>> should not have cars.
>
>>> Nice to see yet another bureacratic public sector body approaching a problem
>>> with a win-win approach (NOT). Why don't these people realise that it could
>>> be solved without antagonising everyone with immediate threats, but to work
>>> with them to come up with a sensible solution?
>
>> Such as?
>
>
> Have you got a dropped kerb outside your house Doug?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gollumofcatford/2620828418/>
Yes, he has.