|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Dec 18, 2007 02:50
Mike Hughes wrote:
> In message
> s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
> Doug riseup.net> writes>> This should please motorists here but obviously I didn't get killed so
>> no cause for celebration
>>
>> Yesterday I was cycling along a bus lane in the dark with my lights on
>> and noticed a car facing me in the middle of the road waiting to turn
>> right. Just as I drew opposite he slammed into me knocking me and the
>> bike flying. The driver said he didn't see me. I had a narrow escape
>> some time ago when a white vanman pulled out of a side turning without
>> seeing me and just manage to stop about an inch away. This seems to be
>> a common occurrence
>>
> With your long record of calling others a LIAR, before I can make any
> comment or extend any sympathy I'd like to know exactly when and where
> this accident happened.
>
> Exactly what (outer) clothing were you wearing? You have already stated ...
|
| Show full article (4.14Kb) |
|
| | 204 Comments |
|
|
Author: NMNM Date: Dec 18, 2007 03:02
Brian Robertson wrote:
>>
>
> Typical stupid reply from a typically stupid motorist.
Only masochistic cyclists have brains?
>
> The length and breadth of Britain, there are now countless schemes where
> cyclists are encouraged to share the pavement with pedestrians. This
> little fact always seems to be passed over in a motorists rant.
And this little fact seems to be passed over in your rant, It's against
the law to ride on the pavement, unless specifically permitted.
>
> And as I think I have pointed out on here before, there are also
> countless sets of traffic lights where a bike will not cause them to
> change, and many more where it is very much in the cyclists interest to
> crash them to stay ahead of the mindless 4 wheeled thugs we are forced
> to share the highway with.
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Date: Dec 18, 2007 03:35
NM wrote:
> Brian Robertson wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> Typical stupid reply from a typically stupid motorist.
>
> Only masochistic cyclists have brains?
>
>>
>> The length and breadth of Britain, there are now countless schemes
>> where cyclists are encouraged to share the pavement with pedestrians.
>> This little fact always seems to be passed over in a motorists rant.
>
> And this little fact seems to be passed over in your rant, It's against
> the law to ride on the pavement, unless specifically permitted.
>>
>> And as I think I have pointed out on here before, there are also
>> countless sets of traffic lights where a bike will not cause them to
>> change, and many more where it is very much in the cyclists interest ...
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NMNM Date: Dec 18, 2007 04:06
Brian Robertson wrote:
> NM wrote:
>> Brian Robertson wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Typical stupid reply from a typically stupid motorist.
>>
>> Only masochistic cyclists have brains?
>>
>>>
>>> The length and breadth of Britain, there are now countless schemes
>>> where cyclists are encouraged to share the pavement with pedestrians.
>>> This little fact always seems to be passed over in a motorists rant.
>>
>> And this little fact seems to be passed over in your rant, It's
>> against the law to ride on the pavement, unless specifically permitted.
>>>
>>> And as I think I have pointed out on here before, there are also
>>> countless sets of traffic lights where a bike will not cause them to ...
|
| Show full article (1.73Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: ®i©ardo®i©ardo Date: Dec 18, 2007 04:37
NM wrote:
> Brian Robertson wrote:
>> NM wrote:
>>> Brian Robertson wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Typical stupid reply from a typically stupid motorist.
>>>
>>> Only masochistic cyclists have brains?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The length and breadth of Britain, there are now countless schemes
>>>> where cyclists are encouraged to share the pavement with
>>>> pedestrians. This little fact always seems to be passed over in a
>>>> motorists rant.
>>>
>>> And this little fact seems to be passed over in your rant, It's
>>> against the law to ride on the pavement, unless specifically permitted.
>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Dec 18, 2007 05:02
®i©ardo wrote:
> NM wrote:
>> Brian Robertson wrote:
>>> NM wrote:
>>>> Brian Robertson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Typical stupid reply from a typically stupid motorist.
>>>>
>>>> Only masochistic cyclists have brains?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The length and breadth of Britain, there are now countless schemes
>>>>> where cyclists are encouraged to share the pavement with
>>>>> pedestrians. This little fact always seems to be passed over in a
>>>>> motorists rant.
>>>>
>>>> And this little fact seems to be passed over in your rant, It's
>>>> against the law to ride on the pavement, unless specifically permitted. ...
|
| Show full article (1.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Dec 18, 2007 05:46
Brian Robertson wrote:
>>>> A lot of things I do on my bike are illegal. And I intend to continue
>>>> doing them as a means of staying a lot safer.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good, then you won't object if I drive my car in a similar fashion
>>> with the same disregard for the law.
>>
>> Outraged splutter: "But that's different!"
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>
> What I was actually going to say was, "So what's new?".
You've admitted that you break the law when you ride a bicycle. You are
alleging, without evidence, that Mr Morgan breaks the law when he
drives. I'd say what's new is that your case is a confession and your
allegation is a libel without foundation in fact.
|
| Show full article (0.77Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DougDoug Date: Dec 19, 2007 02:06
On 18 Dec, 11:02, NM all.com> wrote:> Brian Robertson wrote:
>
>> Typical stupid reply from a typically stupid motorist.
>
> Only masochistic cyclists have brains?
>
>
>
>> The length and breadth of Britain, there are now countless schemes where
>> cyclists are encouraged to share the pavement with pedestrians. This
>> little fact always seems to be passed over in a motorists rant.
>
> And this little fact seems to be passed over in your rant, It's against
> the law to ride on the pavement, unless specifically permitted.
>
Why do you think that cyclists cycle on pavements? Cos people like you
make the roads too dangerous for them. The reason I don't cycle on the
pavement is because it is strewn with pavement furniture serving road
vehicles and a lack of dropped kerbs. Also, I don't see why I should ...
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: FodFod Date: Dec 19, 2007 03:59
On Dec 19, 10:06 am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:> On 18 Dec, 11:02, NM all.com> wrote:> Brian Robertson wrote:
>>>> Typical stupid reply from a typically stupid motorist.
>
>> Only masochistic cyclists have brains?
>
>>> The length and breadth of Britain, there are now countless schemes where
>>> cyclists are encouraged to share the pavement with pedestrians. This
>>> little fact always seems to be passed over in a motorists rant.
>
>> And this little fact seems to be passed over in your rant, It's against
>> the law to ride on the pavement, unless specifically permitted.
>
> Why do you think that cyclists cycle on pavements? Cos people like you
> make the roads too dangerous for them.
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Dec 19, 2007 05:15
> Why do you think that cyclists cycle on pavements?
Because they are arrogant tossers who don't care about the safety of
pedestrians. They are also hypocrites who whine on about their own
safety while putting others at risk without need.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
