I'm giving a hug.

...[] .++ 2 .: [] <interactive>:1:0: precedence parsing error cannot mix `(.:)' [infixr 5] and `(.++)' [infixl 5] in the same infix expression <interactive>:1:0: precedence parsing error cannot mix `(.++)' [infixl 5] and `(.:)' [infixr 5] in the same infix expression I assume Hugs would give something similar. -- Chris Smith

On 27 Feb., 11:37, torb...@app-2.diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) wrote: friskyf...@web.de writes: hi everyone, i just wonder how the expression 1:[] ++ 2:[] is evaluated by hugs to '[1,2]' because ':' and '++' both have binding priority 5. so it should be evaluated like ( ( 1:[] ) ++ 2 ) : [] which istn't type correct... : and ++ are ...

Hello I'm trying to read a file in using readFile in Hugs to perform some functions on it and it works fine with the standard Windows Latin subset but when I try to read in a Unicode file I get errors. In the manual it says that Unicode is supported for Strings and Comments so I'm not sure why it's not working. Thanks for any help Robin

http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/water_health/health1/1-why-drink-water-not-thirsty.htm Thanks FRIENDS And STAY HEALTHY!!! ~Tom Coss~ ((((HUGS))))

http://community-2.webtv.net/harryswallace/BANKACCOUNT/ Thanks FRIENDS, Take Care, And God Bless! ~Tom Coss~ ((((HUGS))))

...instead No, no, no. In Duhg's anarchic utopia, there wouldn't BE any police. There wouldn't be any need for them, either, because everybody would live happily in harmony, hugging trees and fluffy bunny-rabbits. Fluffy bunny rabbits go well in a casserole (without the fluff) In Dzhugs. vegan utopia there would not be any bunny rabbits or lambs or any other cute animals, ...

... the need. It's frivolous hypermobility and they should use a pedal cycle instead No, no, no. In Duhg's anarchic utopia, there wouldn't BE any police. There wouldn't be any need for them, either, because everybody would live happily in harmony, hugging trees and fluffy bunny-rabbits. Fluffy bunny rabbits go well in a casserole (without the fluff) -- Tony the Dragon

... way to train police to drive at high speed. They shouldn't be allowed cars at all , eliminating the need. It's frivolous hypermobility and they should use a pedal cycle instead No, no, no. In Duhg's anarchic utopia, there wouldn't BE any police. There wouldn't be any need for them, either, because everybody would live happily in harmony, hugging trees and fluffy bunny-rabbits.

...>| Cute attempts to turn this into a regional issue aside, when that | | no-talent ass clown Liebermann cozies up to Republicans and abandons | | the agenda of his party, what does he expect? Hugs and high fives? | | What is the "agenda" of his party? | | The people who consider themselves Democrats long ago moved away from | support of George Bush's jihad, but Joltin Joe Liebermann is...