Steve Firth wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2006 22:05:02 -0800, iiiiDougiiii wrote:
>
>> Steve Firth wrote:
>>> On 22 Nov 2006 22:16:07 -0800, iiiiDougiiii wrote:
>>>
>>>> Steve Firth wrote:
>>>>> On 22 Nov 2006 02:12:50 -0800, iiiiDougiiii wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> DV is the minimum standard acceptable, not the puny MPEG2 that you use
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> HDV *is* MPEG2 Duhg, you know nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Depends what camera you are using.
>>>
>>> No Duhg, the HDV spec specifies the use of MPEG2, so you're talking
>>> bollocks, again.
>
> And once more you try a diversionary tactic, rather than admitting your
> ignorance of all things to do with video.
>
> And you publish an article dating from 2001, which makes you look rather
> silly, it was after all five years ago and computers have come on "quite a
> bit" since then.
I have also published quotes from 2003 amd 2006 which absolutely
contradict your absurd claim that video encoding only takes a 'few
minutes' on one computer, so stop trying to wriggle out of your obvious
ingnorance of all things video. Where are your quotes to support your
claim? When arre you going to tell me the file size of the original
MPEG2 you converted to AVI?
