> iiiiDougiiii wrote:
>

>> Really? He wrote:
>>
>> "You admit (despite your usual diversionary tactics) that your claim
>> that
>> you need multiple computers to compress video was utter, arrant
>> bullshit.
>> Since it is perfectly possible to compress video from higher quality
>> source
>> material than you use, by a greater compression ration, resulting in
>> higher
>> quality video at a higher frame rate and for a longer (three times
>> longer!)
>> video clip, yet to do with in just a few minutes."
>>
>> Yet my quote states:
>>
>> "Like other encoding schemes, the MPEG4 encoding process is
>> computationally intensive and takes a frustratingly long time."

>
> Doug, this quote does not contradict Steve's statement. It cannot be
> used in any way as 'proof' that he was lying about anything.
>

>> and
>>
>> "...it wouldn't be too outrageous to want to distribute the encoding
>> process to the other (presumably idle) PCs in our home."

>
> And niether does this quote.