| Re: Here you go then Duhg |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: iiiiDougiiiiiiiiDougiiii Date: Nov 23, 2006 06:45
> iiiiDougiiii wrote:
>
>> So you can take Filth's AVI with a pinch of salt, plus the fact that I
>> have proved he was lying about encoding times.
>
> You haven't proved he was lying about anything. Doug, you have to be
> careful about bandying around claims like that; they are, esentially,
> baseless.
Really? He wrote:
"You admit (despite your usual diversionary tactics) that your claim
that
you need multiple computers to compress video was utter, arrant
bullshit.
Since it is perfectly possible to compress video from higher quality
source
material than you use, by a greater compression ration, resulting in
higher
quality video at a higher frame rate and for a longer (three times
longer!)
video clip, yet to do with in just a few minutes."
Yet my quote states:
"Like other encoding schemes, the MPEG4 encoding process is
computationally intensive and takes a frustratingly long time."
and
"...it wouldn't be too outrageous to want to distribute the encoding
process to the other (presumably idle) PCs in our home."
| 
