|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DougDoug Date: Aug 20, 2008 10:16
Just seen on ITV news.
Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard but
this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
Justify?
|
| |
|
| | 61 Comments |
|
|
Author: AdrianAdrian Date: Aug 20, 2008 10:26
Doug riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:
> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
> animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard but
> this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
> to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
> Justify?
Simple.
The graveyard isn't being dug up solely to kidnap a known corpse in order
to try to blackmail somebody running a perfectly legitimate business.
The remains from the graveyard will be relocated - as with any other
graveyard which is relocated - with dignity, in known locations.
If you REALLY can't spot a difference between the two, your moral compass
is even more fucked than we suspected.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Date: Aug 20, 2008 10:26
> Just seen on ITV news.
>
> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
> animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard
I doubt that you saw any such thing on TV, since the claim is a
ludicrous invention made by you.
> but this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
> to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
> Justify?
Ah yes, and the bodies in question will be dug up by a flying squad of
the unwashed who will then blackmail the relatives of the deceased in an
attempt to force the relatives to give up their employment, will they?
No, I thought not.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Aug 20, 2008 10:36
On 20 Aug, 18:16, Doug riseup.net> wrote:> Just seen on ITV news.
>
> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
> animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard but
> this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
> to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
> Justify?
Excellent, Doug. I will add this to the wikipedia entry on you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
I have already added a bit on your justification for digging up bodies
in the pursuit of ART activities, but this just gets better and
better. Keep 'em coming, Gollum!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Aug 20, 2008 10:36
Doug wrote:
> Just seen on ITV news.
>
> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
> animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard but
> this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
> to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
> Justify?
>
> --
> UK Radical Campaigns
> www.zing.icom43.net
> One man's democracy is another man's regime.
Well lets see
The remains will be dug up with respect
They will be relocated in a graveyard in a location which is know.
The operation will be legal.
There will be no criminal intent.
The operation will be conducted in a proper manner.
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Aug 20, 2008 10:44
> Just seen on ITV news.
>
> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
> animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard but
> this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
> to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
> Justify?
>
I've not seen this mentioned elsewhere so I'll treat it with scepticism ,
but can you not see a difference between a proper organised , legal and
respectful exhumation of human remains followed by their careful re-burial,
and a bunch of bath dodging criminals stealing a corpse and taunting the
relatives?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Mike ConnallyMike Connally Date: Aug 20, 2008 11:06
In article
34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup
So what -ists should dominate a transport forum?
Horse-ists? Bicycle-ists? What method of transport
is politically correct in the Doug view of the universe?
If it mustn't have a 'motor', then what must it be?
A sailing ship, perhaps? Difficult to transport
stuff to Reading on a sailing ship, I postulate.
Or do the Dougs of this world propose that there
should be no transport at all?
But I'll bite. Let's try a year or so with the
abolition of all forms of self-motivating transport,
and see if we like it. Wind power rules, OK?
--
Mike Connally
Had to take action 'against spam'. Remove those words to reply.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: novicenovice Date: Aug 20, 2008 11:11
BrianW wrote:
> On 20 Aug, 18:16, Doug riseup.net> wrote:>> Just seen on ITV news.
>>
>> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
>> animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard but
>> this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
>> to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
>> Justify?
>
> Excellent, Doug. I will add this to the wikipedia entry on you:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>
> I have already added a bit on your justification for digging up bodies
> in the pursuit of ART activities, but this just gets better and
> better. Keep 'em coming, Gollum!
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Aug 20, 2008 11:28
Mike Connally wrote:
> In article
> 34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> >> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup
>
> So what -ists should dominate a transport forum?
> Horse-ists? Bicycle-ists? What method of transport
> is politically correct in the Doug view of the universe?
> If it mustn't have a 'motor', then what must it be?
> A sailing ship, perhaps? Difficult to transport
> stuff to Reading on a sailing ship, I postulate.
> Or do the Dougs of this world propose that there
> should be no transport at all?
>
> But I'll bite. Let's try a year or so with the
> abolition of all forms of self-motivating transport,
> and see if we like it. Wind power rules, OK?
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Knight Of The RoadKnight Of The Road Date: Aug 20, 2008 11:46
> Motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup expressed disgust when
> animal rights activists dug up a single dead body in a graveyard but
> this is nothing compared to the plan to put a road through a graveyard
> to assist Heathrow expansion and where many loved ones will be dug up.
> Justify?
You need to see a psychiatrist.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
