| Re: Green light to anarchy: Eco-activists cleared of power station damage after using climate change as defence |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: DhungisthickDhungisthick Date: Sep 12, 2008 22:22
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:28:48 -0700 (PDT), Doug riseup.net>
wrote:
>On 12 Sep, 08:24, NotMe googlemail.com> wrote:>> On 12 Sep, 07:58, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>>>>> Just in case those here have any doubts about the matter. It says the
>>> jury agreed with the judge.
>>
>>> "Protesters have been given a legal 'green light' to commit crime
>>> after six Greenpeace activists accused of vandalising a power station
>>> were cleared, an ex minister has warned.
>>
>>> The eco-campaigners admitted causing damage to the value of ВЈ30,000
>>> when they climbed a chimney and began painting a slogan.
>>
>> Great!
>> Does this mean we can all wander around to your house and throw bricks
>> through your windows?
>>
>Only if you can show that I am causing a greater harm than your brick,
>which would be extremely difficult if you are a motorist causing more
>harm than me by driving to my house.
But that's not anarchy - anarchy permits me to attend your address and
set fire to it, and to you, should I wish.
You really don't understand what the term Anarchy really means do you?
How about you get someone to read to you the following:
* "Absence of government; a state of lawlessness due to the
absence or inefficiency of the supreme power; political disorder."
* "A theoretical social state in which there is no governing
person or body of persons, but each individual has absolute liberty
(without the implication of disorder)."
* "Absence or non-recognition of authority and order in any given
sphere."
There don't seem to be any caveats about just cause in any of the
above definitions do there?
| 
