> On Sep 12, 8:28 am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>> On 12 Sep, 08:24, NotMe googlemail.com> wrote:
>>

>>> On 12 Sep, 07:58, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>>>> Just in case those here have any doubts about the matter. It says the
>>>> jury agreed with the judge.
>>>> "Protesters have been given a legal 'green light' to commit crime
>>>> after six Greenpeace activists accused of vandalising a power station
>>>> were cleared, an ex minister has warned.
>>>> The eco-campaigners admitted causing damage to the value of £30,000
>>>> when they climbed a chimney and began painting a slogan.

>>> Great!
>>> Does this mean we can all wander around to your house and throw bricks
>>> through your windows?

>> Only if you can show that I am causing a greater harm than your brick,
>> which would be extremely difficult if you are a motorist causing more
>> harm than me by driving to my house.
>>

>
> Doug drove a 4x4 land rover and wastefully lives by himself. he's
> killed mice and has multiple harmful computers. I could go on but
> given that the brick is a useful tool for society that, with other
> bricks, can provide housing for the rich and poor alike its such an
> easy case to prove. Bricks can also be recycled many times.
>
> Brick 1, Doug 0.
>
> Damn, I hope that by proving the brick is less damaging that I'm not
> inciting anyone. No matter how stupid he is I wish no harm to befall
> Doug. He's much to funny to waste.
>
> Fod