|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BrianBrian Date: Oct 15, 2007 08:38
On 15 Oct, 15:31, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > Airbus has started to ship the A380. This means that a plane capable of
> 95 miles per passenger per gallon is now a commercial reality.
>
> I'm sure Duhg will welcome this improvement in fuel economy and the
> small step towards saving the planet.
Aren't they also building a freighter version of the A380? If so, I
imagine the price of air-freighted lentils will plummet, which will
undoubtedly be welcomed by the Catford sage.
|
| |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Date: Oct 15, 2007 09:02
Brian hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 Oct, 15:31, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >> Airbus has started to ship the A380. This means that a plane capable of
>> 95 miles per passenger per gallon is now a commercial reality.
>>
>> I'm sure Duhg will welcome this improvement in fuel economy and the
>> small step towards saving the planet.
>
> Aren't they also building a freighter version of the A380?
Yup.
> If so, I imagine the price of air-freighted lentils will plummet, which
> will undoubtedly be welcomed by the Catford sage.
It was said of the 747 that it was one of the most efficient, cheapest
per unit moved devices yet invented. The A380 looks set to undercut the
747 by a considerable margin.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter ThomasPeter Thomas Date: Oct 15, 2007 11:01
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:35:30 -0700, Brian hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On 15 Oct, 17:02, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >> Brian hotmail.com> wrote:>>> On 15 Oct, 15:31, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >>>> Airbus has started to...
|
| Show full article (1.46Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Oct 15, 2007 11:06
Peter Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:35:30 -0700, Brian hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>On 15 Oct, 17:02, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >>> Brian hotmail.com> wrote:>>>> On...
|
| Show full article (1.46Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter ThomasPeter Thomas Date: Oct 15, 2007 11:14
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:06:14 +0100, Phil Bradshaw
wrote:
>Peter Thomas wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:35:30 -0700, Brian hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>On 15 Oct, 17:02, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >>>> Brian
|
| Show full article (1.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Oct 15, 2007 12:28
Peter Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:06:14 +0100, Phil Bradshaw
> wrote:
> >>Peter Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:35:30 -0700, Brian
|
| Show full article (2.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Oct 16, 2007 06:43
"Peter Thomas" googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1db7h35j7bikd3j87t6bf8nn3v0t8uufem@4ax.com...>
> Why was shipping excluded from Kyoto?
Probably because they would have had to base it on where a ship is
registered, resulting in a lot of ships reregistering to a country not bound
by the protocol.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
