|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DougDoug Date: Jun 25, 2008 06:55
On 25 Jun, 12:01, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > How accurate is Duhng's favourite newspaper? Perhaps the following
> illustrates the meticulous standards of Daily Mail journalism well.
You are lying again, Filth. Its not my favourite newspaper. It just
seems to have more articles about killer motorists and other
lawbreaking drivers than most.
Talking of killer motorists, has anyone glanced at the Radio Times?
Today we have the following TV progs:
Most shocking dangerous drivers.
Road wars.
Police stop!
Worlds scariest police chases.
Then there is always that perennial favourite Police, Camera, Action,
which shows motorists at their very worst.
It is frightening to realise that such people are allowed loose on our
roads to wreak mayhem and death at the touch of an accelerator..
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
|
| | 57 Comments |
|
|
Author: AdrianAdrian Date: Jun 25, 2008 07:00
Doug riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:
> It is frightening to realise that such people are allowed loose on our
> roads to wreak mayhem and death at the touch of an accelerator..
It certainly is. But as long as they get ratings, the film crews will
continue to be out there.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: Jun 25, 2008 07:02
Doug wrote:
> On 25 Jun, 12:01, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >> How accurate is Duhng's favourite newspaper? Perhaps the following
>> illustrates the meticulous standards of Daily Mail journalism well.
>
> You are lying again, Filth. Its not my favourite newspaper.
Liar!!
> It just
> seems to have more articles about killer motorists and other
> lawbreaking drivers than most.
And a ghoul who revels in other people's tragedies can't resist subscribing
to the capitalist press can you?
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NotMeNotMe Date: Jun 25, 2008 07:34
On 25 Jun, 14:55, Doug riseup.net> wrote:> On 25 Jun, 12:01, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> >> How accurate is Duhng's favourite newspaper? Perhaps the following
>> illustrates the meticulous standards of Daily Mail journalism well.
>
> You are lying again, Filth. Its not my favourite newspaper. It just
> seems to have more articles about killer motorists and other
> lawbreaking drivers than most.
Dzhugashvili it is the "newspaper" that you quote the most, and as you
say it is the "newspaper" that you empathise with the most, as you
seem to like wallowing in other peoples misery. Then you try to drag
everyone else down to the lowest level by continually posting the
daily mail rubbish here.
Dragging everyone down to the lowest level is a bit like what
Dzhugashvili tried to do in the Soviet Union.
|
| Show full article (1.13Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Jun 25, 2008 07:31
> On 25 Jun, 12:01, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >> How accurate is Duhng's favourite newspaper? Perhaps the following
>> illustrates the meticulous standards of Daily Mail journalism well.
>
> You are lying again, Filth. Its not my favourite newspaper.
You quote from it every single day. You post more quotes from the Daily
Mail than any other signle source and if ICBA to add them all up, I
suspect more than all your other "sources" added together.
In that sense, it is your favourite by any objective measure.
> It just seems to have more articles about killer motorists and other
> lawbreaking drivers than most.
And since it has been shown to be a source that tells lies in order to
get "a good headline" why should anyone believe the Daily Heil's take on
cars any more than they should believe its discredited take on
terrorism?
[snip more propagandising bullshit]
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ®i©ardo®i©ardo Date: Jun 25, 2008 09:15
Doug wrote:
> On 25 Jun, 12:01, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >> How accurate is Duhng's favourite newspaper? Perhaps the following
>> illustrates the meticulous standards of Daily Mail journalism well.
>
> You are lying again, Filth. Its not my favourite newspaper. It just
> seems to have more articles about killer motorists and other
> lawbreaking drivers than most.
>
> Talking of killer motorists, has anyone glanced at the Radio Times?
> Today we have the following TV progs:
>
> Most shocking dangerous drivers.
> Road wars.
> Police stop!
> Worlds scariest police chases.
>
> Then there is always that perennial favourite Police, Camera, Action,
> which shows motorists at their very worst.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NotMeNotMe Date: Jun 25, 2008 10:40
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:37:11 -0700 (PDT) in message: <0880e0b4-
c393-4000-8bdc-6aa19ad45939@ z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> Doug
riseup.net> wrote:> I don't own an energy intensive TV
Liar! Liar! pants on fire!.
On 25 Jun, 14:55, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> Talking of killer motorists, has anyone glanced at the Radio Times?
Hypocrite!!!!!!!
So you buy a glossy paper magazine about television programs, when you
can look them up on the internet.
> Today we have the following TV progs:
Looking at TV programs when you claim not to own a TV
LIAR and HYPOCRITE
> Most shocking dangerous drivers.
> Road wars.
> Police stop!
> Worlds scariest police chases.
HYPOCRITE
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: John WrightJohn Wright Date: Jun 25, 2008 11:36
Doug wrote:
> On 25 Jun, 12:01, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >> How accurate is Duhng's favourite newspaper? Perhaps the following
>> illustrates the meticulous standards of Daily Mail journalism well.
>
> You are lying again, Filth. Its not my favourite newspaper. It just
> seems to have more articles about killer motorists and other
> lawbreaking drivers than most.
>
> Talking of killer motorists, has anyone glanced at the Radio Times?
> Today we have the following TV progs:
>
> Most shocking dangerous drivers.
> Road wars.
> Police stop!
> Worlds scariest police chases.
>
> Then there is always that perennial favourite Police, Camera, Action,
> which shows motorists at their very worst.
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: FodFod Date: Jun 25, 2008 12:20
On Jun 25, 7:59 pm, "Tooomy" antymxail.co.uk> wrote:>>> You are lying again, Filth. Its not my favourite newspaper. It just
>>> seems to have more articles about killer motorists and other
>>> lawbreaking drivers than most.
>
> Oh Doug, I've noticed the Daily Mail has no pictures of actual murders or
> car accidents (only the aftermath)
>
> Does it mean they didn't happen (Irony too much for the - crickey whats the
> word - vermin and the fungi?
> no thats unfair to mice, cockroaches or the rats and they are certainly no
> fun guys:)
>
> Steve - have you worked out from my "pittiful" attempts at humour who I am
> yet or why I mke money out of my words?
Despite many requests for you to give us the name of the program you
sold you've yet to do so.
Perhaps no one here actually believes you do make money from your
words?
|
| Show full article (0.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: FodFod Date: Jun 26, 2008 01:04
On Jun 25, 9:02Â pm, "Tooomy" antymxail.co.uk> wrote:> "Fod" googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4fb81cb2-aee5-414e-8820-60b574a03c55@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> Â You do seem to be more coherent than usual today. Â I wonder why there
>>> is such a wide range in the clarity of your posts?
>
> Sometimes I try and answer points made, sometimes If I make a point its
> answered by the usual suspects within 2 minutes and my reasoned debate is
> cut then I think I may as well play up to the image that Steve has made for
> me
>
> Anyway, do you really want to know why I'll not give information that will
> identify me?
Well you since said that it was a group effort so its hardly going to
single you out is it?
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
