On 20 Sep, 08:40, Doug
riseup.net> wrote:> On 20 Sep, 08:23, "Graculus"
hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>>> "Doug"
riseup.net> wrote in message>
>>news:026a35f8-b4ca-45a9-b7ba-2bc7afbf0e72@
8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
hotmail.co.uk>
>> wrote:>
>>> "Doug"
riseup.net> wrote in message>
>
>>> "пїЅ People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
>>> пїЅ Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
>>> ----
>
>>> Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on
>>> topic.
>
>>> How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
>>> responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
>>> about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
>>> pointed out that something has been done.
>
>> You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
>> killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
>
>> ---
>
>> Which was not the point you initially brought up. You started the thread by
>> saying should be done about texting while driving. It was pointed out that
>> it's illegal. That was nothing to do with killer motorists, as the story you
>> quoted was about research, and nothing to do with road deaths. So you
>> changed the point, and claimed that it was responding to the question of
>> what the "something" is. Remember, sending a text is not the same as mowing
>> someone down.
>
>> So, once again, what do you think should be done about people who text while
>> driving, considering that it's already illegal?
>
> Since texting while driving puts lives in danger it has everything to
> do with killer motorists. The penalties for texting while driving are
> ludicrously light, as are most penalties for dangerous motorists.
> Presumably you don't consider that deliberately putting lives at risk
> on our roads is at all serious?
Read that case yet, Gollum?
