iiiiDougiiii wrote:
> Fod wrote:
>> Doug stated ( as a defense against getting the 4.7 gig max size of a
>> DVD completely wrong)
>>
>> "Yes most movies are now on dual layer but as far as I know such
>> recordable discs are not used for video cameras and indeed they seem to
>> be in very short supply on the shelves of computer and other shops. My
>> guess is that dual layer recordable discs would make it too easy to
>> copy the rented movies, as no compression would be involved. "
>>
>> these discs are not in short supply, i saw several packs in my local
>> tesco last night. I saw several packs on sale on the web yesterday.
>>
> They are not in my Tesco nor in my local computer shops. Where did I
> claim they are not on the internet, liar?
perhaps you should look at the discs more closely. any that are
suitable for dual layer burning are more than 4.7gig
>> "DV is the minimum standard acceptable, not the puny MPEG2 that you
>> use"
>>
>> isn't Mpeg2 a form of DV?
>>
> Why don't you try to learn something about video befiore posting your
> stupid accusations?
so you are stating that Mpeg2 isn't a well known standard of storing
and viewing digital video? interesting...
> The point you are trying to avoid is that Filth claimed professional
> status
just like you but you still make lots of errors and your status is only
because the bbc have used some of your stuff. Your not in any accepted
way professional but claim to be so, perhaps to impress us? I had a
short story published once, does that make a professional author in
your eyes?
> but made that particular glaring error and he was also unable to
> point to a selection of videos he claimed to have made, hence his
> obvious bullshit.
You asked for one, he gave you one. You moved the goalposts.... His
error was no more glaring than any you've made in this area why should
his be worse than yours?
> BTW, why are you trying to stick up for him, arselicker? Do you have
> some kind of SPECIAL relationship with Filth?
ah, just because i find the time to point out the major flaws in your
arguement you have to become abusive? Yet you moan that motorists on
this group are abusive to you?
civil discussion beyond you now? Given that i've not been abusive to
you in any of these threads.
Fod
