| Re: Filth on the defensive. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: iiiiDougiiiiiiiiDougiiii Date: Dec 22, 2006 00:09
Fod wrote:
> Doug stated ( as a defense against getting the 4.7 gig max size of a
> DVD completely wrong)
>
> "Yes most movies are now on dual layer but as far as I know such
> recordable discs are not used for video cameras and indeed they seem to
> be in very short supply on the shelves of computer and other shops. My
> guess is that dual layer recordable discs would make it too easy to
> copy the rented movies, as no compression would be involved. "
>
> these discs are not in short supply, i saw several packs in my local
> tesco last night. I saw several packs on sale on the web yesterday.
>
They are not in my Tesco nor in my local computer shops. Where did I
claim they are not on the internet, liar?
>
> "DV is the minimum standard acceptable, not the puny MPEG2 that you
> use"
>
> isn't Mpeg2 a form of DV?
>
Why don't you try to learn something about video befiore posting your
stupid accusations?
>
> I'll post more of your errors later. They are certainly just as bad as
> the misuse of the term rendering rather than compression.
>
The point you are trying to avoid is that Filth claimed professional
status but made that particular glaring error and he was also unable to
point to a selection of videos he claimed to have made, hence his
obvious bullshit.
BTW, why are you trying to stick up for him, arselicker? Do you have
some kind of SPECIAL relationship with Filth?
| 
