Since I have proved Steve Filth to be a liar and a bullshitter,
particularly regarding video and alcoholism, he is now trying to get
his own back by stooping to the posting of several new non-transport
threads containing lies about me. By this may he be judged.

iiiiDougiiii wrote:

People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Brimstone wrote:

Quite. Filth criticised my videos out of the blue and responded when
challenged on alcoholism:

"Whoever made the analogy to start with is a shallow, witless fool.
Probably
an associate of yours."

It is his habit to respond to most debates with personal abuse, not
just against me but to many others on this NG, particularly when he is
in the wrong. Draw your own conclusions.

On 20 Dec 2006 02:54:17 -0800, iiiiDougiiii wrote:

Since you have done no such thing...

On Dec 20, 10:54 am, "iiiiDougiiii" zing.icom43.net> wrote:

I remember that you made many mistakes about video formats and
compression but all i recall you taking steve to task about was the use
of the term rendering rather than compressing which given the mistakes
you yourself made wasn't so bad.

You proved yourself to have no understanding of alcholism
prettyquickly.

Steves thread had just about as indirect links to transport as a lot of
the stuff you post.

Fod

On 20 Dec 2006 03:19:37 -0800, iiiiDougiiii wrote:

It wasn't out of the blue, you have been ranting for over a year about your
"need" to produce "broadcast quality" video and you were then and continue
now to preen yourself about your skills in this area. However the items
that *you* chose to make available are appalling, at best they serve as
examples of how not to do video. Over compressed with artefacts such as
combing, pixellation and blocking that would be considered as unacceptable
if the image had been made using a mobile phone.

Your only reponse was the truly predictable "show me your own video then"
followed by the also predictable mocking by you, despite the observation of
the majority of other users that the example shown was superior to the
examples you have created.

You then go on to rant that you have "proved" me to be a bullshitter in
this respect which is, quite frankly, a lie or a remarkable piece of self
deceit on your part.

You didn't "challenge" me on alcoholism, you posted your bizarre theory
contrary to every item of advice given by those who care for alcoholics.

Steve Firth wrote:

Liar.

Liar. You were the one doing the bullshit preening about your alleged
contribution to Men and Motors.

Fod wrote:

Exactly what mistakes do you claim I have made?

No it is you and your mates who have no understanding, by taking it for
granted that alcoholics cannot go into remission. You obviously have no
knowledge of the subject whatsoever and rely only on populist sources. ...

On Dec 20, 3:59 pm, "iiiiDougiiii" zing.icom43.net> wrote:

you claim to be a professional but didn't know that you could get more
than 4.7 gig on a dvd...
I recall you made several other mistakes about formats and compression
in that thread.

what should i make of all this? That neither of you are professional
video editors?

Fod

On 20 Dec 2006 07:59:22 -0800, iiiiDougiiii wrote:

Not at all, your posts are on record at Google, ou started rtanting on
about your need for multiple computers to produce video in April 2005, in
the thread "All cars produce toxic emissions.".