> I'm almost tempted to feel sorry for them. Motoring must be getting
> quite demanding these days. Still, its their choice to drive.

> I'm almost tempted to feel sorry for them. Motoring must be getting
> quite demanding these days. Still, its their choice to drive.
>
> "Millions of motorists will receive parking tickets by post after
> being caught on CCTV camera under rules that have been called
> "Orwellian".
>
> Drivers spotted by the "Big Brother" cameras also face fines of up to
> £120 as part of a Government shake-up of parking regulations which
> comes into effect from Monday, March 31.
>
> Until now, wardens have had to hand a ticket to a driver or leave it
> on the windscreen.
>
> But now they will also be able to issue the tickets remotely, without
> the driver knowing about it until they receive the Penalty Charge
> Notice through their letterbox..."
>
> More: ...

> On 22 Mar, 06:55, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>> I'm almost tempted to feel sorry for them. Motoring must be getting
>> quite demanding these days. Still, its their choice to drive.

>
> A comparison of this post and Duhg's previous post demonstrates just
> what a dishonest and hypocritical old turd he is. On the one hand,
> the previous post appears to be in line with his claims of being an
> anarchist. This post, however, shows that Schmoug just loves the
> surveillance state, provided it is only surveying people he doesn't
> like.
>
> It's the same with his claims to be an environmentalist, animal rights
> supporter etc. The reality is that Duhg wants the right for him and
> his mates to do whatever they like, whilst preventing anyone else from
> doing things...

> I'm almost tempted to feel sorry for them. Motoring must be getting
> quite demanding these days. Still, its their choice to drive.
>

> Brian Whitehead wrote:

>> On 22 Mar, 06:55, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>>> I'm almost tempted to feel sorry for them. Motoring must be getting
>>> quite demanding these days. Still, its their choice to drive.

>

>> A comparison of this post and Duhg's previous post demonstrates just
>> what a dishonest and hypocritical old turd he is. �On the one hand,
>> the previous post appears to be in line with his claims of being an
>> anarchist. �This post, however, shows that Schmoug just loves the
>> surveillance state, provided it is only surveying people he doesn't
>> like.

>

>> It's the same with his claims to be an environmentalist, animal rights
>> supporter etc. �The reality is that Duhg wants the right for him and
>> his mates to do whatever they like, whilst preventing anyone else from
>> doing things which Duhg cannot (or does not want to) do. �Or, put more
>> simply, he is nothing more than a selfish old cunt.

>
> Brian, you are giving 'selfish old cunts' a bad name, they would not ...

> On 22 Mar, 09:26, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:

>> Brian Whitehead wrote:

>>> On 22 Mar, 06:55, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>>>> I'm almost tempted to feel sorry for them. Motoring must be getting
>>>> quite demanding these days. Still, its their choice to drive.

>>

>>> A comparison of this post and Duhg's previous post demonstrates just
>>> what a dishonest and hypocritical old turd he is. ?On the one hand,
>>> the previous post appears to be in line with his claims of being an
>>> anarchist. ?This post, however, shows that Schmoug just loves the
>>> surveillance state, provided it is only surveying people he doesn't
>>> like.

>>

>>> It's the same with his claims to be an environmentalist, animal
>>> rights supporter etc. ?The reality is that Duhg wants the right for
>>> him and his mates to do whatever they like, whilst preventing
>>> anyone else from doing things which Duhg cannot (or does not want
>>> to) do. ?Or, put more simply, he is nothing more than a selfish old
>>> cunt. ...

> Does it need to be any more that just "bollen". That alone seems to be
> sufficiently descriptive and enough to provoke a range of emotions ranging
> from disgust to hilarity.