|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Sep 2, 2008 02:21
I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
"With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&dmode=source
Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
|
| |
|
| | 7 Comments |
|
|
Author: Mike PMike P Date: Sep 2, 2008 03:06
"never" is the correct answer to your question Brian.
Mike P
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Sep 2, 2008 03:36
On 2 Sep, 11:06, "Mike P" privacy.net> wrote:> "never" is the correct answer to your question Brian.
What, are you suggesting that Mr Bollen is a liar?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Sep 2, 2008 05:34
BrianW wrote:
> I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
> fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
> one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
> "With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
> income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&dmode=source
>
> Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
--
Tony the Dragon
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Sep 2, 2008 07:10
On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:> BrianW wrote:
>> I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
>> fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
>> one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
>> "With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
>> income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
>
>
>> Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
>
> Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
Doug, I think.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ed BangerEd Banger Date: Sep 2, 2008 08:59
>On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:>> BrianW wrote:
>>> I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
>>> fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
>>> one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
>>> "With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
>>> income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
>>
>>
>>> Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
>>
>> Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
>
>Doug, I think.
|
| Show full article (0.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: Sep 2, 2008 09:17
Ed Banger wrote:
>> On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:>>> BrianW wrote:
>>>> I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing
>>>> old- fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion
>>>> that "no one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight",
>>>> you responded "With suitable taxation they will have to" and
>>>> "Those with a higher income should pay proportionately higher
>>>> taxes"
>>>
>>>
>>>> Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an
>>>> "anarchist"?
>>>
>>> Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.00Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: PetertPetert Date: Sep 2, 2008 10:53
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:59:10 +0100, Ed Banger bangor.com> wrote:
>>On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:>>> BrianW...
|
| Show full article (1.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
