|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Jun 12, 2008 05:49
In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie and
cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically decent
character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features mentioned
in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is therefore highly
offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise to Gollum for any
distress I may have caused.
|
| |
|
| | 27 Comments |
|
  |
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: Jun 12, 2008 06:26
BrianW wrote:
> In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
> re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
> Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie and
> cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically decent
> character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
>
> Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features mentioned
> in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is therefore highly
> offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise to Gollum for any
> distress I may have caused.
Apology noted.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: soupsoup Date: Jun 12, 2008 07:52
BrianW wrote:
> In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
> re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
> Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie and
> cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically decent
> character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
>
> Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features mentioned
> in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is therefore highly
> offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise to Gollum for any
> distress I may have caused.
Apology not required. Gollum *is* a repulsive, degraded, murderous
creature, who will lie and cheat to get what he wants. The good creature
he evolved from was Smeagle so carry on calling repulsive, degraded,
murderous creatures, who will lie and cheat to get what they want Gollum.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Jun 12, 2008 09:00
> BrianW wrote:
>> In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
>> re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
>> Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie and
>> cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically decent
>> character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
>
>> Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features mentioned
>> in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is therefore highly
>> offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise to Gollum for any
>> distress I may have caused.
>
> Apology not required. Gollum *is* a repulsive, degraded, murderous
> creature, who will lie and cheat to get what he wants. The good...
|
| Show full article (1.44Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Jun 12, 2008 09:29
BrianW wrote:
>> BrianW wrote:
>>> In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
>>> re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
>>> Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie and
>>> cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically decent
>>> character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
>>> Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features mentioned
>>> in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is therefore highly
>>> offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise to Gollum for any
>>> distress I may have caused.
>> Apology not required. Gollum *is* a repulsive, degraded, murderous
>> creature, who will lie and cheat to get what he wants. The good creature
>> he evolved from was Smeagle so carry on calling repulsive, degraded,
>> murderous creatures, who will lie and cheat to get what they want Gollum.
>
> All you say is true, but I would also have to point out that Gollum is
> far smarter than Duhg. I very much doubt that Gollum would contend
> that there are two types of ozone, that 0.108 cubic metres is 1.08 ...
|
| Show full article (1.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: soupsoup Date: Jun 12, 2008 09:48
BrianW wrote:
> soup wrote:
>> Apology not required. Gollum *is* a repulsive, degraded, murderous
>> creature, who will lie and cheat to get what he wants. The good creature
>> he evolved from was Smeagle so carry on calling repulsive, degraded,
>> murderous creatures, who will lie and cheat to get what they want Gollum.
> All you say is true, but I would also have to point out that Gollum is
> far smarter than Duhg. I very much doubt that Gollum would contend
> that there are two types of ozone, that 0.108 cubic metres is 1.08
> litres, or that one can find the interference minima of two waves
> simply by adding the frequencies together I therefore still contend that
> I have been unfair on poor old Gollum by comparing him to Dung.
True. I would accept your apology but it is not to me it is to TR(the
real)Gollum.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ed BangerEd Banger Date: Jun 12, 2008 10:11
>> BrianW wrote:
>>> In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
>>> re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
>>> Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie and
>>> cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically decent
>>> character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
>>
>>> Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features mentioned
>>> in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is therefore highly
>>> offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise to Gollum for any
>>> distress I may have caused.
>>
>> Apology not required. Gollum *is* a repulsive, degraded, murderous
>> creature, who will lie and cheat to get what he wants. The good creature
>> he evolved from was Smeagle so carry on calling repulsive, degraded,
>> murderous creatures, who will lie and cheat to get what they want Gollum. ...
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: Jun 12, 2008 10:23
Ed Banger wrote:
>>> BrianW wrote:
>>>> In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
>>>> re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
>>>> Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie
>>>> and cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically
>>>> decent character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
>>>
>>>> Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features
>>>> mentioned in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is
>>>> therefore highly offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise
>>>> to Gollum for any distress I may have caused.
>>>
>>> Apology not required. Gollum *is* a repulsive, degraded, murderous
>>> creature, who will lie and cheat to get what he wants. The good
>>> creature he evolved from was Smeagle so carry on calling repulsive, ...
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: soupsoup Date: Jun 12, 2008 11:18
Ed Banger wrote:
> What is Duhg's precious?
Surely there should be more s' in that?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Jun 12, 2008 13:09
On 12 Jun, 18:11, Ed Banger bangladesh.com> wrote:
>>> BrianW wrote:
>>>> In recent months, I have been referring to Doug as "Gollum". Having
>>>> re-read the Hobbit, I now realise that I have been grossly unfair.
>>>> Gollum is a repulsive, degraded, murderous creature, who will lie and
>>>> cheat to get what he wants. He started off as a basically decent
>>>> character, but was lead astray by the power of the Ring.
>
>>>> Doug, on the other hand, has none of the redeeming features mentioned
>>>> in the last sentence. Comparing him to Gollum is therefore highly
>>>> offensive to Gollum, and I unreservedly apologise to Gollum for any ...
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|