Re: Dirty tactics to defend a dirty industry
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Dirty tactics to defend a dirty industry         

Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: Doug
Date: Aug 7, 2008 22:54

On 6 Aug, 12:34, "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>> On 6 Aug, 18:51, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <0720bd8a-e47a-461f-8182-79888815d22c@
>>> 2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
>
>>>> As I keep on saying, before building more and more power stations,
>>>> steps should be taken to economise on energy use.
>
>>> So when are you going to stop buying imported food and also start
>>> growing your own?
>
>> I grow some of my own already and I will stop importing when farmers
>> here can provided all the food we need to stay healthy without
>> excessive energy use.
>
>> When are you going to start reducing your consumption?
>
>>>> Secondly, if such
>>>> stations must be built they should incorporate technology, such as
>>>> carbon capture, to clean up their emissions.
>
>>> I thought you said that was unproven and therefore greenwash? Make
>>> your fucking mind up won't you?
>
>> Duh! It goes without saying that if the technology proves to be
>> impractical then the power stations should not be built. Kingsnorth is
>> putting the cart before the horse.
>
> Wrong again Doug, Kingsnorth is providing a facility where new
> anti-pollution equipment technology and be tested and developed on a
> commercial size plant. How else do you make sure that the equipment works on
> a full size installation rather then only on a test set up?

By using it on an old power station rather than building a completely
new one and using unproven technology as a lame excuse to build it.

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
Capitalism forces the taxpayer to bail out profiteers when things go
wrong.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!