|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Jul 7, 2008 15:35
Steve Firth wrote:
> Someone seems to be failing in his duty to monitor the Daily Mail for
> tales of road users being given derisory punishment for "murder" - or is
> it "terrorism"? A road user caused the death of a young girl, but even
> if he is found guilty of killing the girl the maximum punishment he
> faces is a laughable £2000 fine.
>
> Given the circumstances, why is there no outcry from our resident Mr
> Angry?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6d58q8
I don't know how many times you have to be told.
The pedestrian can not be at fault, because she is a victim & a pedestrian.
The cyclist can not be at fault as he was a cyclist.
Therefor either nobody was at fault or it was somebody elsa.
Such an accident could not happen, therefore somebody was at fault.
But who was at fault? perhaps Dug could help.
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: Mike PMike P Date: Jul 8, 2008 01:29
"Tony Dragon" btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:Y7ednQu_kavWB-_VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...> Steve Firth wrote:
>> Someone seems to be failing in his duty to monitor the Daily Mail for
>> tales of road users being given derisory punishment for "murder" - or is
>> it "terrorism"? A road user caused the death of a young girl, but even
>> if he is found guilty of killing the girl the maximum punishment he
>> faces is a laughable
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ®i©ardo®i©ardo Date: Jul 8, 2008 01:36
Tony Dragon wrote:
> Steve Firth wrote:
>> Someone seems to be failing in his duty to monitor the Daily Mail for
>> tales of road users being given derisory punishment for "murder" - or is
>> it "terrorism"? A road user caused the death of a young girl, but even
>> if he is found guilty of killing the girl the maximum punishment he
>> faces is a laughable £2000 fine.
>>
>> Given the circumstances, why is there no outcry from our resident Mr
>> Angry?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/6d58q8>
> I don't know how many times you have to be told.
> The pedestrian can not be at fault, because she is a victim & a pedestrian.
> The cyclist can not be at fault as he was a cyclist.
> Therefor either nobody was at fault or it was somebody elsa.
> Such an accident could not happen, therefore somebody was at fault.
> But who was at fault? perhaps Dug could help.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FodFod Date: Jul 8, 2008 08:06
On Jul 7, 11:35 pm, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:> Steve Firth wrote:
>> Someone seems to be failing in his duty to monitor the Daily Mail for
>> tales of road users being given derisory punishment for "murder" - or is
>> it "terrorism"? A road user caused the death of a young girl, but even
>> if he is found guilty of killing the girl the maximum punishment he
>> faces is a laughable £2000 fine.
>
>> Given the circumstances, why is there no outcry from our resident Mr
>> Angry?
>
>
> I don't know how many times you have to be told.
> The pedestrian can not be at fault, because she is a victim & a pedestrian.
> The cyclist can not be at fault as he was a cyclist.
> Therefor either nobody was at fault or it was somebody elsa.
> Such an accident could not happen, therefore somebody was at fault.
> But who was at fault? perhaps Dug could help.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.72Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: SquashmeSquashme Date: Jul 8, 2008 12:16
On 7 Jul, 23:35, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:> Steve Firth wrote:
>> Someone seems to be failing in his duty to monitor the Daily Mail for
>> tales of road users being given derisory punishment for "murder" - or is
>> it "terrorism"? A road user caused the death of a young girl, but even
>> if he is found guilty of killing the girl the maximum punishment he
>> faces is a laughable £2000 fine.
>
>> Given the circumstances, why is there no outcry from our resident Mr
>> Angry?
>
>
> I don't know how many times you have to be told.
> The pedestrian can not be at fault, because she is a victim & a pedestrian.
> The cyclist can not be at fault as he was a cyclist.
> Therefor either nobody was at fault or it was somebody elsa.
This Elsa sounds the most likely to be guilty. Tell us more about her.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: John WrightJohn Wright Date: Jul 8, 2008 23:49
Fod wrote:
> On Jul 7, 11:35 pm, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:>> Steve Firth wrote:
>>> Someone seems to be failing in his duty to monitor the Daily Mail for
>>> tales of road users being given derisory punishment for "murder" - or is
>>> it "terrorism"? A road user caused the death of a young girl, but even
>>> if he is found guilty of killing the girl the maximum punishment he
>>> faces is a laughable £2000 fine.
>>> Given the circumstances, why is there no outcry from our resident Mr
>>> Angry?
>>> http://tinyurl.com/6d58q8>> I don't know how many times you have to be told.
>> The pedestrian can not be at fault, because she is a victim & a pedestrian.
>> The cyclist can not be at fault as he was a cyclist.
>> Therefor either nobody was at fault or it was somebody elsa.
>> Such an accident could not happen, therefore somebody was at fault.
>> But who was at fault? perhaps Dug could help.
>>
>> If indeed the cyclist was at fault why was he not charged with
>> manslaughter, instead of getting of lightly with a charge of ...
|
| Show full article (2.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
