| Re: Congestion charges changes scrapped |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: Ed BangerEd Banger Date: Jul 8, 2008 12:24
>Ed Banger bangladesh.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
>were saying:
>
>>>If it is producing less CO2 it is also very likely to have better fuel
>>>consumption. Not something associated with AWD.
>
>> Ah, I see. So how do you account for the Toyota Rav4 D-4D, which has
>> official government CO2 emission figures of 173g/km, compared to a Ford
>> Mondeo 2.0 petrol saloon (in the 185-225 g/km band)?
>
>189, actually.
>And, size-
>for-size, engine-for-engine, adding AWD or changing a "normal car" body
>for an "SUV" body always means precisely that. Fact. End of.
Yet there were SUV bodies with AWD that would not have been liable for
Ken's silly ВЈ25 tax (now thankfully abolished), while there would have
been "normal cars" that would have been, which makes nonsense of the
statement I was responding to. Fact. End of.
--
Ed Banger
|