CO2 and GW is good for the planet.
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport Profile…
 Up
CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: Conor
Date: Jun 9, 2008 05:50

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=569586

'The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and
Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA
satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades,
the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%%. About
25%% of the Earth's vegetated landmass ? almost 110 million square
kilometers ? enjoyed significant increases and only 7%% showed
significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that
each square meter of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams of
greenery per year.' Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point
to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2, fertilizing the
biota and resulting in the increased green side effect."

Care to comment, Doug?

--
Conor

I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
96 Comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: Brimstone
Date: Jun 9, 2008 05:57

Conor wrote:
> http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=569586
>
> 'The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and
> Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA
> satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades,
> the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%%. About
> 25%% of the Earth's vegetated landmass ? almost 110 million square
> kilometers ? enjoyed significant increases and only 7%% showed
> significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that
> each square meter of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams
> of greenery per year.' Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones,
> point to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2,
> fertilizing the biota and resulting...
Show full article (0.95Kb)
no comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: NotMe
Date: Jun 9, 2008 06:29

On 9 Jun, 13:50, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=569586
>
> 'The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and
> Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA
> satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades,
> the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%%. About
> 25%% of the Earth's vegetated landmass ? almost 110 million square
> kilometers ? enjoyed significant increases and only 7%% showed
> significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that
> each square meter of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams of
> greenery per year.' Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point
> to the warming of the planet and the presence...
Show full article (1.21Kb)
no comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: Doug
Date: Jun 9, 2008 07:18

On 9 Jun, 13:50, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=569586
>
> 'The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and
> Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA
> satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades,
> the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%%. About
> 25%% of the Earth's vegetated landmass ? almost 110 million square
> kilometers ? enjoyed significant increases and only 7%% showed
> significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that
> each square meter of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams of
> greenery per year.' Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point
> to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2, fertilizing the
> biota and resulting in the increased green side effect."
>
> Care to comment, Doug?
>
Certainly. This is just one aspect of climate change which ignores
rising sea levels and increased weather variability and intensity,
also changes to habitats. Yet another example of cherry picking in an ...
Show full article (1.39Kb)
5 Comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: francis
Date: Jun 9, 2008 07:21

On Jun 9, 3:18 pm, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> On 9 Jun, 13:50, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> 'The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and
>> Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA
>> satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades,
>> the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%%. About
>> 25%% of the Earth's vegetated landmass ? almost 110 million square
>> kilometers ? enjoyed significant increases and only 7%% showed
>> significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that
>> each square meter of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams of
>> greenery per year.' Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point
>> to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2, fertilizing the
>> biota and resulting in the increased green side effect."
>
>> Care to comment, Doug?
>
> Certainly. This is just one aspect of climate change which ignores ...
Show full article (1.52Kb)
no comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: Tony Dragon
Date: Jun 9, 2008 07:25

Doug wrote:
> On 9 Jun, 13:50, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=569586
>>
>> 'The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and
>> Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA
>> satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades,
>> the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%%. About
>> 25%% of the Earth's vegetated landmass ? almost 110 million square
>> kilometers ? enjoyed significant increases and only 7%% showed
>> significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that
>> each square meter of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams of
>> greenery per year.' Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point
>> to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2, fertilizing the
>> biota and resulting in the increased green side effect."
>>
>> Care to comment, Doug?
>>
> Certainly. This is just one aspect of climate change which ignores
> rising sea levels and increased weather variability and intensity, ...
Show full article (1.61Kb)
no comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: francis
Date: Jun 9, 2008 07:28

On Jun 9, 3:25 pm, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>> On 9 Jun, 13:50, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> 'The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and
>>> Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA
>>> satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades,
>>> the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%%. About
>>> 25%% of the Earth's vegetated landmass ? almost 110 million square
>>> kilometers ? enjoyed significant increases and only 7%% showed
>>> significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that
>>> each square meter of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams of
>>> greenery per year.' Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point
>>> to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2, fertilizing the
>>> biota and resulting in the increased green side effect."
>
>>> Care to comment, Doug?
>
>> Certainly. This is just one aspect of climate change which ignores ...
Show full article (1.79Kb)
no comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: ®i©ardo
Date: Jun 9, 2008 11:28

Doug wrote:
> On 9 Jun, 13:50, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your implied denial of anthropogenic global warming duly noted.
>
> --
> Carfree Cities
> http://www.carfree.com/
> Promoting practical alternatives to car dependence - walking, cycling
> and public transport.
>
>
>
>
Ve are vatching you! We haff vays of making you believe!

--
Moving things in still pictures!
no comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: Conor
Date: Jun 9, 2008 13:00

In article fbec5969543a@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
> Certainly. This is just one aspect of climate change which ignores
> rising sea levels

Sea levels have been higher in the past. A recent cliff fall at Sewerby
revealed a prehistoric beach a good 10ft higher than the existing one.
> and increased weather variability and intensity,
> also changes to habitats. Yet another example of cherry picking in an
> attempt at justification of current over-consumption of resources.
>
Just like the cherry picking the Global Warming, sorry, Climate Change
brigade do?

--
Conor

I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
no comments
Re: CO2 and GW is good for the planet.         


Author: Brimstone
Date: Jun 9, 2008 13:30

Conor wrote:
> In article > fbec5969543a@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
>
>
>> Certainly. This is just one aspect of climate change which ignores
>> rising sea levels
>
> Sea levels have been higher in the past. A recent cliff fall at
> Sewerby revealed a prehistoric beach a good 10ft higher than the
> existing one.
>
>> and increased weather variability and intensity,
>> also changes to habitats. Yet another example of cherry picking in an
>> attempt at justification of current over-consumption of resources.
>>
> Just like the cherry picking the Global Warming, sorry, Climate Change
> brigade do?

Oh no, that's "good" cherry picking! ;-)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9