>Here's an engine that represents an astronomical advance in vehicle engine
>technology.
>
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/18/scimerc118.xml

> "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>

>> Here's an engine that represents an astronomical advance in vehicle
>> engine technology.
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/18/scimerc118.xml

>
> How the fuck can someone describing something as a 'Star Trek-style
> ion engine' call himself a science correspondent?
>
> Then it gets worse expressing the engine thrust in units of weight of
> fractional kiwi fruits.
>
> Don't think he knows the difference between brake and break either
> although in the context used neither make much sense.

> "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>>Here's an engine that represents an astronomical advance in vehicle engine
>>technology.
>>
>>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/18/scimerc118.xml

>
> How the fuck can someone describing something as a 'Star Trek-style ion
> engine' call himself a science correspondent?

> Then it gets worse expressing the engine thrust in units of weight of
> fractional kiwi fruits.

> Don't think he knows the difference between brake and break either although
> in the context used neither make much sense.

> "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>

>>Here's an engine that represents an astronomical advance in vehicle engine
>>technology.
>>
>>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/18/scimerc
>>118.xml
>>

> How the fuck can someone describing something as a 'Star Trek-style ion
> engine' call himself a science correspondent?
>
> Then it gets worse expressing the engine thrust in units of weight of
> fractional kiwi fruits.
>
> Don't think he knows the difference between brake and break either although
> in the context used neither make much sense.

> nospam wrote:
>

>> "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>

>>> Here's an engine that represents an astronomical advance in vehicle
>>> engine technology.
>>>
>>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/18/scimerc
>>> 118.xml
>>>

>> How the fuck can someone describing something as a 'Star Trek-style
>> ion engine' call himself a science correspondent?
>>
>> Then it gets worse expressing the engine thrust in units of weight of
>> fractional kiwi fruits.
>>
>> Don't think he knows the difference between brake and break either
>> although in the context used neither make much sense.

> ...

>
>The sign of a competent writer is that uses the language of the audience.
>

> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:47:25 -0000, "Brimstone"
> yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>

>>
>> The sign of a competent writer is that uses the language of the
>> audience.
>>

>
> My arse.
>

> Steve Firth wrote:

>> nospam wrote:
>>

>>> "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Here's an engine that represents an astronomical advance in vehicle...

> The idiot also appears to be unable to spell BepiColombo correctly.