> "Mike Henry" <{$mrtickle$}@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:75r2b4p9mnq3850j8b0f75dsgdgm7mfo9q@4ax.com...

>> In <1219584469.25891.0@proxy02.news.clara.net>, "Colonel Colt"
>> spam.org> wrote:
>>

>>> "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:vbWdnasSeKYs0yzVnZ2dnUVZ8qTinZ2d@bt.com...

>>>>
>>>> I had some wanker do that to me on the motorway a few days ago,
>>>> just because he'd spotted a HA patrol car sitting on one of the
>>>> police humps on
>>>> the opposite carriageway.
>>>>

>>> Which is an argument for hidden speed cameras.

>>
>> That's pretty spectacular twisted logic you have there!
>>

> Since anti-speed camera people routinely claim that speed cameras are
> 'dangerous' because people to panic break when going past, hidden
> cameras would certainly address that