> A major air disaster then suddenly every minor aircraft technical
> difficulty starts making the headlines.
>
> This is very much non-news.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7578428.stm
>
> Remember, the most dangerous part of your flight is the drive to and
> from the airport.
>
> On a train or aircraft you're statistically about 15 times safer then
> when you're in a car.
>
> Road safety is an oxymoron there's hardly any safety culture on the
> roads compared to the airline or rail industries.
>
> It is no lie and safe to say, that if the rail or aviation industry
> ran our roads you would never see a single transgression of the
> highway code. ...

>middlelight@googlemail.com wrote:

>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT), allan tracy
>> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>

>>> Believe it or not, I quite like speed cameras.

>>
>> Why? They're nothing whatsoever to do with road safety, and
>> everything to do with revenue generation.

>
>Perhaps he's employed by one of the "safety" camera partnerships.
>

> On Aug 24, 9:21 am, Speedgazebo gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Aug 24, 8:54 am, FCS my-deja.com> wrote:
>>

>>> On Aug 23, 6:44 pm, "Fred X" himki.net> wrote:

>>

>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:13:52 +0100, allan tracy

>>

>>>> hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> A major air disaster then suddenly every minor aircraft technical
>>>>> difficulty starts making the headlines.

>>

>>>>> This is very much non-news.

>>
>> I have read this entire post several times now, and haven't a clue
>> what it's all about.

>
> Perhaps you could consult an ordained minister on
> that one.
> ...

>So, let me guess, you're a born-again who got a
>direct access license.

> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:03:31 +0100, "Brimstone"
> yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>

>> middlelight@googlemail.com wrote:

>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT), allan tracy
>>> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Believe it or not, I quite like speed cameras.

>>>
>>> Why? They're nothing whatsoever to do with road safety, and
>>> everything to do with revenue generation.

>>
>> Perhaps he's employed by one of the "safety" camera partnerships.
>>

> I don't mind speed cameras either. They only trigger if you exceed the
> speed limit. Far more dangerous to society are the surveillance and
> ANPR cameras and the loss of the right to go about your business
> without being bothered by plod except on reasonable suspicion.

> So, let me guess, you're a born-again who got a
> direct access license. Your post backs a few things
> I've said about that particular scheme up.

> "FCS" my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:3e1f3a67-90de-491e-a949-7febbfb1b358@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 24, 9:21 am, Speedgazebo gmail.com> wrote:
>
>

>>So...

>worm cock.

> FCS my-deja.com> wrote:

>> So, let me guess, you're a born-again who got a
>> direct access license. Your post backs a few things
>> I've said about that particular scheme up.

>
> WRONG!
>
> And you're a holier-than-thou motorcyclist with less than perfect
> experience?

> mentalguy2008 googlemail.com> wrote:
>

>> "FCS" my-deja.com> wrote in message
>> news:3e1f3a67-90de-491e-a949-7febbfb1b358@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>> On Aug 24, 9:21 am, Speedgazebo gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>

>>>So, let me guess, you're a born-again who got a
>>>direct access license.

>>
>> I think you lost them when you posted about riding in the rain.....
>>
>> Do not, under any circumstances, go to a UKRM "meet". It's like a middle
>> managers convention for Dr Who geeks filming a "Mr Muscle" advert. Ah
>> yes,
>> you'd get the impression from this newsgroup that they're all true
>> bikers,
>> heading to the meets at 340mph and knocking over a few lollipop ladies. ...