> Petert googlemail.com> gurgled happily, sounding
> much like they were saying:
>

>>>> Far be it for me to interfere on a post that is addressed to Duhng,
>>>> but I'm not sure that you're correct that a car may not be driven
>>>> if it does not have a current/valid VED.

>

>>> It can be - in certain very limited circumstances.

>

>> They being?

>
> To or from a pre-booked MOT, on tradeplates, and (I _think_) to a
> requested pre-registration inspection of an imported vehicle at a
> LVLO.