| Re: Baby dies after car mounts kerb. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: PetertPetert Date: Sep 20, 2008 11:38
On 20 Sep 2008 18:35:03 GMT, Adrian gmail.com> wrote:
>Petert googlemail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much
>like they were saying:
>>> Far be it for me to interfere on a post that is addressed to Duhng, but
>> I'm not sure that you're correct that a car may not be driven if it does
>> not have a current/valid VED.
>
>It can be - in certain very limited circumstances.
They being?
>
>> AIUI, the driver/owner of the vehicle may be prosecuted (by the DVLA,
>> not the police) for the offence, but the car may not be siezed at it
>> would be if it was uninsured
>
>Oh, yes, it can...
On what grounds?
--
Only some ghastly, dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster.
Ken Livingstone 2001.
PeterT - "Reply to" address is a spam trap - all replies to the group please
| 
