Re: Another convert to righteousness
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Another convert to righteousness         

Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: Roger Thorpe
Date: Jul 22, 2008 01:55

Conor wrote:
> In article wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, Roger Thorpe
> says...
>
>>Conor wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article
>>
>>>Walking has been proven to be more polluting than using a car so I
>>>suspect cycling has....
>>>
>>>"Food production is now so energy-intensive that more carbon is emitted
>>>providing a person with enough calories to walk to the shops than a car
>>>would emit over the same distance. "
>>>
>>>Source: How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, by Chris Goodall
>>
>>Oh I really should just go to the coffee machine, but I don't like
>>leaving a statement like that to stand. just a couple of minutes on
>>google to get some figures....
>>So here's another back of envelope calculation.
>>
>>Embedded energy in manufacture and distribution of confectionery =
>>43MJ/kg. [1]
>
>
> Don't believe it. I doubt that the people involved have a clue of
> everything that is involved in the manufacture of confectionary..
>
> For example:
> Does it take into account the artic that travels 150 miles to deliver
> the sweetened condensed milk from the dairy and the artic that travels
> 150 miles to deliver the sugar? Does it take into account the artic
> that travels from the farm to the dairy that produces the condensed
> milk and the artic that travels from the British Sugar factory to the
> aforementioned dairy? Do they factor in the transportation of the sugar
> beet to the British Sugar plant? Do they even know about that?
>
>
>
Yes, I think that they probably do know about all that.
Find the factor of 100000%% to prove me wrong, if you're going to stick
with this claim. It's so ludicrous I'm not going to research it further.
You do the work.
Roger
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: To convert or not to convert, that's the questioncomp.lang.clipper.visual-objects ·