| Re: Another convert to righteousness |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: Roger ThorpeRoger Thorpe Date: Jul 22, 2008 01:55
Conor wrote:
> In article wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, Roger Thorpe
> says...
>
>>Conor wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article
>>
>>>Walking has been proven to be more polluting than using a car so I
>>>suspect cycling has....
>>>
>>>"Food production is now so energy-intensive that more carbon is emitted
>>>providing a person with enough calories to walk to the shops than a car
>>>would emit over the same distance. "
>>>
>>>Source: How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, by Chris Goodall
>>
>>Oh I really should just go to the coffee machine, but I don't like
>>leaving a statement like that to stand. just a couple of minutes on
>>google to get some figures....
>>So here's another back of envelope calculation.
>>
>>Embedded energy in manufacture and distribution of confectionery =
>>43MJ/kg. [1]
>
>
> Don't believe it. I doubt that the people involved have a clue of
> everything that is involved in the manufacture of confectionary..
>
> For example:
> Does it take into account the artic that travels 150 miles to deliver
> the sweetened condensed milk from the dairy and the artic that travels
> 150 miles to deliver the sugar? Does it take into account the artic
> that travels from the farm to the dairy that produces the condensed
> milk and the artic that travels from the British Sugar factory to the
> aforementioned dairy? Do they factor in the transportation of the sugar
> beet to the British Sugar plant? Do they even know about that?
>
>
>
Yes, I think that they probably do know about all that.
Find the factor of 100000%% to prove me wrong, if you're going to stick
with this claim. It's so ludicrous I'm not going to research it further.
You do the work.
Roger
|