> Mike P wrote:

>> Doug wrote:

>>> On 10 Sep, 07:16, "Graculus" hotmail.co.uk>
>>> wrote:

>>>> "Doug" riseup.net> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:9be4b5e2-160a-47f0-8597-b4a10428dcef@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>

>>>>> Makes you wonder why holidaymakers are prepared to go through hell
>>>>> and risk their lives as well as polluting and wasting
>>>>> non-renewables. Is it just consumerism gone rampant?

>>>>

>>>>> "Air passengers face five more years of bans on carrying liquids
>>>>> in their hand luggage, it has emerged.

>>>>
>>>> If not being able to carry a bottle of water onto a plane is your
>>>> idea of hell, then I don't know how you would describe true
>>>> inconvenience and discomfort.
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't make me wonder at all. People will go through that minor
>>>> inconvenience because of the pleasure and "good times" that are at
>>>> the end of the flight. But then, you wouldn't know anything about
>>>> enjoying oneself, a practice banned in DougWorld.

>>>
>>> I think it is airport security measures in total that is the hell as
>>> well as the perceived threat made worse by that security.

>>
>> BWAHAHAHA.. You old fool. When I've flown recently, I've not really
>> noticed it taking any longer to get through security, both here and
>> in the USA. OK, I had to take my shoes off but so what?
>>

> Hopefully your sock were clean?

> There's more than one way to knock out a plane load of people. :-)