> Since riding the wrong along one streets has become topical I took the
> opportunity of taking these photos.
>
> The first photo
> http://www.david.eazyrider.co.uk/public/DSCN9864s.JPG
> shows a footway and a road with no entry.

> As can be seen in the second photo of the other end of the path the footway
> is the official cycle route
> http://www.david.eazyrider.co.uk/public/DSCN9867s.JPG

> Ok, so perhaps someone could offer advice to a rider approaching the no
> entry - should they do the legal thing and weave amongst the pedestrians or
> do the safe but illegal thing and ride along the nice wide road?

> I also notice that in the second photo my camera developed a strange flaw
> where its sensor put a Fiesta shaped object in the picture.

> Since riding the wrong along one streets has become topical I took the
> opportunity of wasting your time on a purile troll attempt

> Since riding the wrong along one streets has become topical I took the
> opportunity of taking these photos.
>
> The first photo
> http://www.david.eazyrider.co.uk/public/DSCN9864s.JPG
> shows a footway and a road with no entry.
>
> As can be seen in the second photo of the other end of the path the footway
> is the official cycle route
> http://www.david.eazyrider.co.uk/public/DSCN9867s.JPG
>
> Ok, so perhaps someone could offer advice to a rider approaching the no
> entry - should they do the legal thing and weave amongst the pedestrians or
> do the safe but illegal thing and ride along the nice wide road?
>
> The cyclist actually has a third option. Which is to go where the cars go
> and turn right to join a three lane carriageway and then filter across all
> three lanes. To add to the fun, if the traffic light is red, the law abiding
> rider can enhance the adrenalin boost while doing it through an accelerating ...

> DavidR wrote:

>> Since riding the wrong along one streets has become topical I took the
>> opportunity of taking these photos.
>>
>> The first photo
>> http://www.david.eazyrider.co.uk/public/DSCN9864s.JPG
>> shows a footway and a road with no entry.

>
> It shows two carriageways, and one no entry sign.

> "Gizmo." ltlrm3.com> wrote

>> "DavidR" 4bidden.org.uk> wrote

>

>>> Since riding the wrong along one streets has become topical I took the
>>> opportunity of wasting your time on a purile troll attempt

>
> Well, thank you for such a constructive comment.
>

>> Ask an adult to help you with the big words
>> http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTransport/Highwaycode/DG_069837

>
> I see that you assume the HC is some kind of religious relic that must be
> obeyed for fear of heavenly retribution.
>
> If someone posts matter regarding content of the HC -
> ~ cycling amongst pedestrians
> ~ one way streets
> ~ use of traffic lights
> ~ driving the pavement ...

> "Nick Finnigan" genie.co.uk> wrote
>

>>DavidR wrote:
>>

>>>Since riding the wrong along one streets has become topical I took the
>>>opportunity of taking these photos.
>>>
>>>The first photo
>>>http://www.david.eazyrider.co.uk/public/DSCN9864s.JPG
>>>shows a footway and a road with no entry.

>>
>> It shows two carriageways, and one no entry sign.

>
>
> The other no entry sign is not in picture. The "other" carriageway can not
> physically be used be used by four+ wheelers. The bollards in the foreground
> are a bit of a give away.

> DavidR wrote:

>> Isn't the HC actualy supposed to be a set of rules/guidelines to promote
>> convenience, responsibility and safety? What happens when the rules
>> conflict with these ideals?

>
> Some of the HC rules *do* conflict with convenience - deliberately so in
> the interests of responsibility and safety.
>
> What's wrong with that (within reason)?