|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DougDoug Date: May 17, 2008 23:01
Different laws for different people or different enforcement of laws?
Also, was the complainant terrorised?
"Police probe after lives are put at risk in Prince Harry's 100mph
motorway race to Boujis
Police are investigating claims that Prince Harry and his bodyguards
took part in a reckless 100mph car chase on their way to Boujis
nightclub.
Company director Tim Williams says his family's lives, including that
of his eight-month-old baby, were put at risk by the convoy's driving.
He has now lodged an official complaint, claiming that he was
tailgated by Royal protection officers who forced him to accelerate to
dangerous speeds.
The drama happened last Saturday when Mr Williams was driving at 70mph
in the middle lane of the M4 near Slough, Berkshire, with his wife,
sister-in-law and baby..."
More:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=567043&in_page_id...
|
| Show full article (1.01Kb) |
|
| | 44 Comments |
|
|
Author: TommyTommy Date: May 18, 2008 01:18
> Different laws for different people or different enforcement of laws?
> Also, was the complainant terrorised?
>
> "Police probe after lives are put at risk in Prince Harry's 100mph
> motorway race to Boujis
Its all how you look at things innit?
Nothing happened - maybe good trained drivers in meticulously(?) maintained
cars should be allowed to drive at a 100mph?
After all there are some people who post here I wouldn't allow them to
drive an airfix model:)
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: AboAbo Date: May 18, 2008 01:47
Doug wrote:
> He has now lodged an official complaint, claiming that he was
> tailgated by Royal protection officers who forced him to accelerate to
> dangerous speeds.
He was forced to do no such thing!
> The drama happened last Saturday when Mr Williams was driving at 70mph
> in the middle lane
Hmm...
--
Abo
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SquashmeSquashme Date: May 18, 2008 10:08
On 18 May, 09:18, "Tommy" googlemail.com> wrote:>> Different laws for different people or different enforcement of laws?
>> Also, was the complainant terrorised?
>
>> "Police probe after lives are put at risk in Prince Harry's 100mph
>> motorway race to Boujis
>
> Its all how you look at things innit?
>
> Nothing happened - maybe good trained drivers in meticulously(?) maintained
> cars should be allowed to drive at a 100mph?
>
Jeeez. High speed driving to take a Prince to a nightclub! Out of the
way, peasants. We are heading back into the 18th century at a rate of
knots. Roll on the tumbrils.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SquashmeSquashme Date: May 18, 2008 10:09
On 18 May, 09:47, Abo wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>> He has now lodged an official complaint, claiming that he was
>> tailgated by Royal protection officers who forced him to accelerate to
>> dangerous speeds.
>
> He was forced to do no such thing!
>
>> The drama happened last Saturday when Mr Williams was driving at 70mph
>> in the middle lane
>
> Hmm...
>
Lemmings complaining about behaviour of Gadarene swine.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: May 18, 2008 11:40
Squashme wrote:
> On 18 May, 09:18, "Tommy" googlemail.com> wrote:>>> Different laws for different people or different enforcement of laws?
>>> Also, was the complainant terrorised?
>>> "Police probe after lives are put at risk in Prince Harry's 100mph
>>> motorway race to Boujis
>> Its all how you look at things innit?
>>
>> Nothing happened - maybe good trained drivers in meticulously(?) maintained
>> cars should be allowed to drive at a 100mph?
>>
>
> Jeeez. High speed driving to take a Prince to a nightclub! Out of the
> way, peasants. We are heading back into the 18th century at a rate of
> knots. Roll on the tumbrils.
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ConorConor Date: May 18, 2008 12:05
> Company director Tim Williams says his family's lives, including that
> of his eight-month-old baby, were put at risk by the convoy's driving.
>
Bullshit. If he was driving correctly, he would have been in Lane 1
well out of the way.
--
Conor
I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DougDoug Date: May 18, 2008 23:55
On 18 May, 20:05, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:>> Company director Tim Williams says his family's lives, including that
>> of his eight-month-old baby, were put at risk by the convoy's driving.
>
> Bullshit. If he was driving correctly, he would have been in Lane 1
> well out of the way.
>
At 70mph?
Why should royalty be allowed to get away with highly dangerous
tailgating?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ConorConor Date: May 19, 2008 09:31
> On 18 May, 20:05, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:>>> Company director Tim Williams says his family's lives, including that
>>> of his eight-month-old baby, were put at risk by the convoy's driving.
>>
>> Bullshit. If he was driving correctly, he would have been in Lane 1
>> well out of the way.
>>
> At 70mph?
Yes, at 70MPH.
> Why should royalty be allowed to get away with highly dangerous
> tailgating?
>
Why should a knob end hold the rest of the world up with his cackhanded
driving ability?
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: John WrightJohn Wright Date: May 19, 2008 11:08
Doug wrote:
> On 18 May, 20:05, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:>>> Company director Tim Williams says his family's lives, including that
>>> of his eight-month-old baby, were put at risk by the convoy's driving.
>> Bullshit. If he was driving correctly, he would have been in Lane 1
>> well out of the way.
>>
> At 70mph?
>
> Why should royalty be allowed to get away with highly dangerous
> tailgating?
Presumably you have some evidence for claiming tailgating is highly
dangerous?
--
John Wright
"What would happen if you eliminated the autism genes from the gene pool?
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
