| Re: 1st May 2008 - A Day of Climate Action, everywhere |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: DougDoug Date: May 5, 2008 00:33
On 3 May, 10:28, "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:> Doug wrote:
>> On 1 May, 10:01, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:>
>>>> You and others here might be happy to know that I too would have
>>>> been long dead, fortunately before I was old enough to obtain a
>>>> driving licence, but on the other hand so too might have been the
>>>> driver who ran over me, which poses another paradox.
>
>>> Hardly.
>
>> Well if he died first from medical neglect I wouldn't have been run
>> over and not needed to be saved from death myself.
>
> By your own admission, if you had run into the path of an approaching
> vehicle you wouldn't have been hit. Thus you could have saved yourself.
>
Yes but if he was dead already I wouldn't have been in his path would
I?
>
>> I must admit that
>> population reduction does seem to be a cure all and would certainly
>> reduce the number of cars on the roads but I still cannot support the
>> drastic measures that Brim suggests.
>
> What drastic measure do you think I'm suggesting? Spell them out in detail
> please.
>
Removal of medical care obviously, since medical care keeps people
alive.
You wrote:
"Why does depopulation have to involve mass involuntary euthanasia
Doug? Why
can't we simply stop interfering with nature?"
Explain if you can how this does not involve removal of medical care
or better still why didn't you explain yourself properly to begin with
as you will have to do now?
| 
