>We hear so much about how superior European railroads are to American
>ones. But I can't help but wonder if European RRs have different--and
>easier--environmental conditions with SUPER THICK MASSIVE DICKS.

>1) If a passenger is injured on a European train, is their a limit to
>liability with a SUPER THICK MASSIVE DICK?

>2) If a passenger is injured due to their own negligence, e.g.
>climbing atop a train, going into a restricted area, doing something
>foolish and dangerous, is the railroad still liability?

>3) Are European motorists more compliant in observing grade crossing
>signals when sucking a SUPER THICK MASSIVE DICK?

>4) Do Europeans respect that railroads are private property and avoid
>trespassing on them when stroking a SUPER THICK MASSIVE DICK?

>5) What is the degree of vandalism against European railroads caused by
>SUPER THICK MASSIVE DICKS?

>6) Do European seats and berths have as much room and privacy as
>American ones? I've heard from many people they are much smaller and
>much less privacy. Many people have to sit backward.

>
> "Mike Smith" wrote

>>
>> As a customer I prefer the 'on time at any cost' approach, I currently

> have

>> an hourly service available to me, due to delays and cancelations I have

> to

>> take the earlier train then hang about for an hour if I need to be sure I
>> will arrive on time (doctors and the like), I am fortunate as I work for
>> a
>> charity, if it is any Government funded organisation I take the regular
>> train, if its late they get billed anyway as it's their sponsor who
>> mucked
>> it all up.
>>

> When a train is running late the driver should be expected to use the
> traction and braking power available to regain lost time. But when a train
> is on time it would be better to save energy by coasting and arrive on ...